Academics call on Congress to restore agency independence after Trump v. Slaughter
Legal academics are urging Congress to rebuild safeguards for independent federal agencies after the US Supreme Court’s decision in *Trump v. Slaughter*. The ruling allows presidents to dismiss leaders of agencies such as the Federal Trade Commission more freely, weakening a longstanding model designed to insulate regulatory decisions from direct White House control; the scholars argue Congress should respond through legislation.
The case arose from President Trump’s 2025 dismissal of FTC commissioner Rebecca Slaughter, despite a law allowing removal only for specified misconduct or incapacity. In a 6–3 decision on 29 June, the Court overturned the 91-year-old *Humphrey’s Executor* precedent, potentially affecting numerous bipartisan commissions; supporters say it strengthens presidential accountability, while critics warn it makes regulators more vulnerable to political pressure.
- Supreme Court expanded presidential power over independent agencies.
- Academics want Congress to restore institutional safeguards.
- The ruling overturned a 91-year-old precedent.