Europe’s top clubs threatened Club World Cup boycott before Fifa plan collapsed
Europe’s leading football clubs threatened to boycott future Club World Cups unless Fifa president Gianni Infantino abandoned a proposed Football Forward Enterprise scheme. The warning, issued shortly before the plan was withdrawn on 1 August, matters because European clubs’ absence would make the tournaments effectively unviable.
The European Football Clubs group said the scheme appeared to place broadcasting, commercial and sponsorship rights under Fifa’s control, rather than a planned joint venture with the clubs. It warned that its members would not support the women’s 2028 or men’s 2029 Club World Cups unless that venture had authority over commercial and operational matters before the women’s tournament rights were sold. Fifa has reportedly promised a meeting to progress the arrangement; last year’s 32-team men’s tournament used a temporary joint model.
- European clubs threatened a Club World Cup boycott.
- The dispute centred on commercial rights and governance.
- Fifa withdrew the contested proposal after criticism.
New here? Start with this
The Club World Cup is a tournament organised by Fifa, football’s world governing body, bringing together leading club teams from different continents. Fifa has expanded it in recent years, including a 32-team men’s competition, while a women’s version is also planned.
European clubs are central to the event because many of the sport’s most valuable and widely followed teams play in Europe. The European Football Clubs group represents leading clubs and negotiates on issues such as match schedules, tournament rules and commercial income.
Broadcasting, sponsorship and other commercial rights generate much of the money around major football competitions. Clubs and Fifa have been discussing a joint arrangement to run parts of the Club World Cup, with disagreement over how much control each side should have.
Both sides, in good faith
The strongest fair case each way — we don't pick a winner.
The case for
European clubs can reasonably argue that, as the teams supplying the competition’s principal sporting and commercial value, they should have meaningful joint control over its operation and revenues. A credible joint venture could protect clubs from unilateral decisions on scheduling, player welfare and media rights, while ensuring proceeds are reinvested transparently in the game. A boycott threat may be seen as the only effective safeguard if assurances about shared governance remain uncertain.
The case against
Fifa can reasonably argue that retaining central control of commercial rights helps it run a genuinely global competition rather than one chiefly shaped by Europe’s richest clubs. Centralised sales may maximise reach, create consistent standards and allow revenue to support football beyond the participating elite, including women’s and developing-game programmes. Allowing clubs decisive authority could weaken Fifa’s ability to balance their commercial interests against those of national associations, players and the wider football community.