Jenny Gilruth pressured to reveal where axe will fall as savage cuts of £658million loom
The Scottish Fiscal Commission (SFC) has warned that a £658million real-terms cut to day-to-day public spending is looming for 2027-28, piling pressure on new Finance Secretary Jenny Gilruth to explain how she will balance the books. The forecaster expects resource funding for services such as the NHS, police and councils to rise only marginally in cash terms, meaning a real-terms decline once inflation is accounted for. The situation matters because it signals significant reductions to frontline public services at a time when the Scottish Government is already under scrutiny over its handling of the economy and public finances.
The projected shortfall is driven largely by a record £720million income tax "reconciliation", which reduces the block grant from the UK Government, alongside rising benefits costs, with the outlook potentially worsening if public sector pay deals exceed current forecasts. The SFC also noted an "economic performance gap", estimating that income tax revenues would have been £888million higher had Scotland's economy grown at the same pace as the UK's in 2024-25. SFC chairman Professor Graeme Roy described the outlook as "exceptionally difficult", while opposition politicians from the Conservatives and Labour criticised the SNP government's economic record and lack of clarity on planned cuts; ministers maintain they have balanced the budget every year despite the challenges.
- SFC warns of £658million real-terms cut to Scottish public spending in 2027-28
- Income tax shortfall and rising benefits costs are key drivers
- Finance Secretary Jenny Gilruth under pressure to detail spending cuts
New here? Start with this
Scotland's public finances are overseen jointly by the Scottish Government, which sets the budget for devolved services like the NHS, schools, police and councils, and the Scottish Fiscal Commission (SFC), an independent body that produces official forecasts of how much money will be available. Jenny Gilruth is the recently appointed Finance Secretary, meaning she is responsible for setting the next Scottish budget and deciding how funding is divided between different services.
Scotland's budget depends heavily on a "block grant" from the UK Government, adjusted according to how much income tax is raised in Scotland compared with the rest of the UK. When these figures are reconciled after the fact, any shortfall has to be repaid, which can sharply reduce the money available in a future year, alongside other pressures such as rising benefits spending and public sector pay costs.
This matters because a real-terms cut of this scale would mean money for day-to-day public services failing to keep pace with inflation, raising questions about which services might see reduced funding. The issue has become politically charged, with opposition parties pressing the Scottish Government for details on where reductions might fall, while ministers point to their record of balancing the budget in previous years.
Both sides, in good faith
The strongest fair case each way — we don't pick a winner.
The case for
Critics argue that a government's central duty is to grow the economy and manage the public finances responsibly, and that Scotland's income tax revenues underperforming the UK by an estimated £888million reflects real policy choices rather than bad luck. With a further £658million real-terms cut looming, they contend that the public, and the services relying on that funding, deserve early and specific answers about where reductions will fall rather than the detail being withheld until closer to the budget. On this view, timely transparency is a basic obligation to voters and service users who will feel the impact of any cuts, not an unreasonable demand on a government still finding its feet.
The case against
Defenders of the government's position note that much of the shortfall arises from the mechanics of the fiscal framework itself, above all a record £720million reconciliation adjustment to the block grant, which is largely outside any single year's ministerial control rather than a product of mismanagement. They point out that the government has balanced its budget every year despite these pressures, including rising benefits costs and the risk of pay deals exceeding forecasts, and argue it is prudent to wait for fuller and firmer fiscal information before naming specific cuts, so as to avoid pre-announcing reductions that later prove unnecessary or badly targeted once the picture becomes clearer.