Bryan Kohberger granted June hearing over guilty plea withdrawal

← Back to the feed

Bryan Kohberger granted June hearing over guilty plea withdrawal

Developing story first seen 3 hours ago

Daily Mail · 3 hours ago

Bryan Kohberger has been granted a status conference and evidentiary hearing next June as he seeks to withdraw his guilty plea for the murders of four University of Idaho students. The development could reopen the case if his post-conviction petition succeeds, potentially returning it to trial and putting the death penalty back into consideration.

Kohberger, 31, received four consecutive life sentences after pleading guilty in July 2025 to killing Ethan Chapin, Madison Mogen, Kaylee Goncalves and Xana Kernodle in Moscow, Idaho, on 13 November 2022. He waived his appeal rights under the plea agreement but is pursuing a separate Idaho post-conviction process, alleging his former lawyers advised him to lie; newly appointed lawyer Gregory Richard Rauch will represent him before Judge Steven Hippler. Victims’ relatives have criticised the renewed legal action, with some saying it causes further distress.

  • Kohberger will have a June hearing on withdrawing his guilty plea.
  • Success could reopen the Idaho murders case.
  • Families say the legal move revives their trauma.

New here? Start with this

The killings of four University of Idaho students in November 2022 drew national attention and led to a lengthy investigation in the city of Moscow, Idaho. Bryan Kohberger, a former criminology student, was arrested weeks later and charged with murdering Ethan Chapin, Madison Mogen, Kaylee Goncalves and Xana Kernodle.

In July 2025, Kohberger pleaded guilty under an agreement that resulted in four life sentences without parole, to be served one after another. The deal meant he did not face a trial and included a waiver of his usual right to appeal the convictions.

He is now using a separate legal route known as post-conviction review, which allows prisoners to challenge a conviction or sentence on limited grounds, including claims about their legal representation. If a court allowed him to withdraw the plea, the case could move back towards trial, where prosecutors could again consider seeking the death penalty.

Both sides, in good faith

The strongest fair case each way — we don't pick a winner.

The case for

Supporters of the hearing would argue that a guilty plea must be genuinely informed, voluntary and based on competent legal advice, especially where it ends a capital case and results in life imprisonment. If Kohberger can credibly show that his lawyers improperly directed him to give false information or otherwise undermined the integrity of the plea, the courts have a duty to examine that claim through an evidentiary process. This view prioritises due process and the principle that even deeply unpopular defendants retain safeguards against wrongful or coerced convictions.

The case against

Opponents would argue that the plea agreement brought a painful, long-running case to a settled conclusion, spared families a trial and avoided further public scrutiny of the killings. Kohberger knowingly waived appeal rights and received the agreed sentence, so reopening the matter risks prolonging victims’ relatives’ distress without a strong initial showing that the plea was invalid. This view prioritises finality, accountability and limiting avoidable trauma for those most affected by the crimes.

More coverage

World

Read the full article at the source →

Originally published by Daily Mail as “Bryan Kohberger is granted NEW hearing in battle to withdraw guilty plea for murdering 4 Idaho students”.