Shein shares slide in long-awaited stock market debut

← Back to the feed

Shein shares slide in long-awaited stock market debut

BBC World · 1 hour ago

Shares in fast-fashion giant Shein fell 8.7% on their long-awaited stock market debut in Hong Kong on Tuesday, after years of failed attempts to list in the US and UK amid concerns over labour practices and environmental impact. The disappointing start suggests investors are sceptical that the company, once valued at nearly $100bn, can sustain its rapid growth given rising costs, regulatory scrutiny and stiffer competition, with the slump also raising the prospect of higher prices for shoppers.

Shein priced its shares at HK$48.56 each on Monday, raising HK$13.6bn ($1.7bn) and valuing the firm at $26.3bn, before they slid to HK$44.4 in early Tuesday trading. The company, founded in China in 2008 and now based in Singapore, said it has over 273 million active customers who placed more than a billion orders in the year to March 2026. Its earlier attempts to list on Wall Street and in London collapsed after lawmakers raised concerns about alleged forced labour and design copying, claims Shein denies, while analysts noted rivals such as Asos and Boohoo have also struggled amid growing investor caution towards fast fashion.

  • Shein shares dropped 8.7% on Hong Kong stock market debut
  • Firm now valued at roughly a quarter of its earlier $100bn estimate
  • Previous US and UK listing plans failed over labour and IP concerns

New here? Start with this

Shein is a fast-fashion retailer, originally founded in China in 2008 and now headquartered in Singapore, known for selling very cheap clothing online at huge volume, with more than 273 million active customers worldwide. For years the company has tried to float its shares on a major stock exchange, but plans to list in New York and London were both dropped after lawmakers and campaigners raised concerns about alleged forced labour in its supply chains, its environmental footprint, and claims it copies designs, all of which Shein denies.

Unable to list in the West, Shein turned to Hong Kong instead, pricing its shares this week and raising around $1.7bn in the process. Rivals in the online fast-fashion space, such as Asos and Boohoo, have also struggled recently, reflecting broader investor caution about the sector's growth prospects and scrutiny of its business practices.

How the listing performs matters beyond Shein itself, as it will be seen as a test of investor appetite for fast-fashion companies more broadly, and could influence the prices customers pay and the way such firms are regulated in future.

Both sides, in good faith

The strongest fair case each way — we don't pick a winner.

The case for

Those sympathetic to the market's caution would argue that the fall reflects investors and regulators finally pricing in real risks that had long been overlooked, including well-documented allegations of forced labour in supply chains, poor factory conditions driven by relentless production cycles, environmental harm from disposable fast fashion, and repeated claims of copying independent designers' work. On this view, a lower valuation is a healthy correction that signals such business models cannot expect the same multiples as companies with cleaner records, and may encourage Shein and its rivals to improve practices rather than simply scale faster.

The case against

Those defending Shein would argue that the scrutiny is disproportionate, pointing out that the company denies the specific allegations, has invested heavily in supply chain audits and compliance, and serves a genuine and enormous consumer base of over 273 million active customers who value affordable clothing. They would note that similar struggles at Western competitors such as Asos and Boohoo suggest the slide reflects broader headwinds across the whole fast-fashion sector rather than problems unique to Shein, and that a Chinese-founded firm may simply be facing heightened geopolitical caution that a comparable Western company would not, meaning it deserves to be judged on its actual governance and performance over time rather than penalised in advance.

Business Markets World

Read the full article at the source →