George Clooney Calls Out ‘Authoritarians’ and ‘People Who Peddle in Fear’ in Moving Venice Golden Lion Speech: They’re ‘Never the Heroes in History’ 

← Back to the feed

George Clooney Calls Out ‘Authoritarians’ and ‘People Who Peddle in Fear’ in Moving Venice Golden Lion Speech: They’re ‘Never the Heroes in History’ 

Developing story first seen 5 hours ago

Variety · 5 hours ago

George Clooney used his Golden Lion for Lifetime Achievement speech at the Venice Film Festival to warn against the politics of fear, telling the audience that "the people who are afraid of books and music and stories are never the heroes in history." Speaking at the festival's opening ceremony on Wednesday night, the actor argued that those in power try to silence journalists and artists first, and that storytelling remains a vital way of fostering empathy at a time when "people in charge" encourage division. The remarks, alongside earlier reported detail of the presentation and red-carpet colour, formed part of a wide-ranging tribute to his 45-year career.

Clooney opened with self-deprecating jokes about receiving a "lifetime achievement" honour before turning serious, insisting films "don't stop wars" or "fix elections" but can remind people that a stranger might be "the hero in somebody else's story." He also thanked his wife, Amal, and children, before closing with a joke about his widely panned turn in "Batman & Robin." The award followed a tribute reel drawing on his Netflix film "Jay Kelly" and was presented by his co-star Laura Dern; the ceremony preceded the world premiere of Danny Boyle's "Ink."

  • Clooney's Venice speech warned that fear-mongering leaders always target artists and journalists first
  • He accepted the Golden Lion for Lifetime Achievement, presented by Laura Dern
  • Speech followed his red-carpet appearance and preceded Danny Boyle's "Ink" premiere

New here? Start with this

George Clooney received the Golden Lion for Lifetime Achievement at this year's Venice Film Festival, one of cinema's most prestigious awards, given for a body of work rather than a single film. Clooney has been acting for around 45 years, known both for roles in films such as the "Ocean's" series and "Michael Clayton" and for his off-screen work as a director and activist. The Golden Lion is presented at the festival's opening ceremony, which also marks the start of ten days of premieres and awards in Venice, Italy.

Venice is one of the world's leading film festivals, and speeches by major stars at its opening night often attract wide attention beyond the film industry, touching on broader social or political themes. Clooney has a long history of speaking out on political and social issues, including press freedom and international affairs, alongside his film career. His wife, Amal Clooney, is a human rights lawyer, and the couple are frequently linked to advocacy work together.

The ceremony also served to promote other festival business, including a tribute reel drawing on Clooney's recent Netflix film "Jay Kelly" and the premiere of Danny Boyle's new film "Ink", underlining how such honours are woven into the festival's wider programme of launches and promotion.

Both sides, in good faith

The strongest fair case each way — we don't pick a winner.

The case for

Supporters of Clooney's remarks argue that artists and public figures have a long, honourable tradition of using acceptance speeches to defend free expression, and that his warning about fear and censorship speaks to genuine, well-documented pressures faced by journalists and storytellers under authoritarian conditions worldwide. They see his point about empathy and storytelling as a principled, non-partisan defence of culture's civic value rather than an attack on any specific figure, and view a lifetime-achievement moment as a legitimate occasion to speak from conscience about issues he has long championed.

The case against

Sceptics contend that film awards ceremonies should stay focused on craft and achievement rather than becoming a platform for political commentary, however broadly phrased. They note that terms like 'authoritarians' and 'people who peddle in fear', while framed as universal truths, are widely read as coded criticism of particular political leaders and movements, which can feel partisan and alienating to part of the audience despite the neutral wrapping. Some also argue that a wealthy, globally famous actor moralising about fear and division risks appearing out of touch, and that art persuades best through the work itself rather than through speeches attached to it.

More coverage

Americas Art Culture Entertainment Film World

Read the full article at the source →