Lawyer urges Letitia James to quit Cornell fraternity investigation over Facebook posts
A lawyer for one of seven Cornell fraternity brothers accused of sexual assault is calling on New York Attorney General Letitia James to step down from leading the investigation. The lawyer argues that James compromised her impartiality by posting on Facebook about the case, expressing support for the alleged victim and stating the allegations as facts before being appointed as special prosecutor. This, he contends, undermines the defendants' right to a fair investigation and due process.
The alleged assault occurred on 19 October 2024 when a woman visited the Chi Phi fraternity house at Cornell University and claims she was too intoxicated to consent to sexual acts, having consumed approximately 10 standard drinks. The local Tompkins County district attorney declined to prosecute, but Governor Kathy Hochul subsequently appointed Attorney General James to lead a criminal investigation. All seven accused fraternity brothers deny any wrongdoing and have not been charged with a crime.
- Attorney General faces calls to step down after prejudging case on social media
- Lawyer says her public comments undermined prosecutorial impartiality before appointment
- Assault allegations from October 2024; local prosecutors declined to bring charges
New here? Start with this
In October 2024, a woman visited the Chi Phi fraternity house at Cornell University and alleged she was sexually assaulted by seven fraternity brothers. She stated she was too intoxicated to consent, having consumed approximately ten standard drinks. The seven accused men deny the allegations and have not been charged with any crime.
When the local district attorney declined to prosecute, Governor Kathy Hochul stepped in. She appointed New York Attorney General Letitia James as special prosecutor to lead a criminal investigation.
Before her appointment, James posted on Facebook expressing support for the alleged victim and stating the allegations as facts. One of the accused men's lawyers has challenged James's impartiality, arguing that her prior public position on the case means she cannot conduct an objective investigation.
Both sides, in good faith
The strongest fair case each way — we don't pick a winner.
The case for
Those supporting recusal argue that an investigator cannot conduct an impartial inquiry after publicly stating allegations as established facts and expressing allegiance to one party. They contend that due process requires investigators to approach cases with an open mind, and that Ms James's Facebook posts—made before her appointment—demonstrate she arrived at conclusions before examining evidence. This prejudgement, they maintain, undermines the fairness of the investigation and violates the accused men's fundamental right to an impartial inquiry, particularly when the process itself carries such serious consequences for their futures.
The case against
Those opposing recusal argue that an Attorney General speaking publicly about sexual assault concerns and supporting victims is consistent with her constitutional role to protect constituents, not evidence of inability to investigate fairly. They contend that advocating for victims as a matter of principle differs meaningfully from prejudging a specific case's facts, and that the Governor's appointment itself reflects confidence in her integrity to investigate thoroughly. They note that recusal standards typically require direct conflicts of interest, not merely having taken public positions on the general issue of sexual assault.
Read the full article at the source →
Originally published by Daily Mail as “Lawyer for one of the Cornell 7 says New York Attorney General Letitia James should step down after stating allegations made against them as facts”.