How Andrew Garfield Combined Crowdsourcing and a Classic Acting Technique to Understand Sam Altman
Developing story first seen 17 hours ago
New details show that Garfield built his portrayal of Sam Altman by speaking with people who had met or worked with the OpenAI chief, using their accounts to inform his own interpretation. The approach matters because a failed attempt to make him resemble Altman with prosthetics led him to focus instead on how others experienced the technology executive.
Garfield also drew on Stanislavski’s acting technique, which considers what characters say about one another, and watched interviews and videos of Altman. The film, *Artificial*, follows OpenAI’s origins and the rise of AI; Yura Borisov plays Ilya Sutskever, while Will Angus portrays Dario Amodei and his interest in AI safety. Neon plans to release the film on Christmas Day.
- Garfield spoke with people who know Sam Altman to shape his performance.
- A failed prosthetics test shifted focus from resemblance to interpretation.
- *Artificial* is planned for release on Christmas Day.
New here? Start with this
Sam Altman is the chief executive of OpenAI, the company that created ChatGPT and other artificial intelligence systems that have gained significant prominence in recent years. Ilya Sutskever and Dario Amodei are prominent researchers at OpenAI whose concerns about AI safety have influenced the company's direction.
A new film titled Artificial, directed by filmmaker Luca Guadagnino, dramatises events at OpenAI and features Andrew Garfield as Altman, Yura Borisov as Sutskever, and Will Angus as Amodei. The film is scheduled for release on Christmas Day through the distributor Neon.
Interest in the film reflects broader public curiosity about the leaders and decisions behind artificial intelligence development. OpenAI's rapid growth and the prominence of its technology have made the company and its executives subjects of significant interest.
Full account
Andrew Garfield has drawn upon a distinctive amalgamation of established theatrical principles and collaborative research to shape his performance as Sam Altman in Luca Guadagnino's Artificial, a film that explores the founding of OpenAI and the trajectory of artificial intelligence within contemporary society. Premiered at the 2026 New York Film Festival, the production features portrayals of several influential figures at the intersection of technology and innovation. When initial attempts to utilise prosthetic elements to enhance physical similarity to Altman proved unsatisfactory, Garfield redirected his preparatory efforts towards more analytical and interpersonal methodologies.
Garfield grounded his characterisation in the Stanislavski system—a venerable approach to acting whereby performers examine dialogue and observations to construct understanding of a character's psychological dimensions. Complementing this classical technique, the actor engaged in systematic consultation with numerous individuals possessing direct knowledge or experience of Altman, treating these conversations as a form of human-centred research. Garfield acknowledged the inherent subjectivity of such encounters, describing how he synthesised contradictory perspectives and impressions before applying his own interpretive sensibility to the role. This layered approach enabled him to transcend mere imitation, instead constructing an original characterisation informed by multiple sources yet ultimately reflective of his own artistic vision.
Garfield's efforts mirrored those of fellow cast members who adopted similarly considered preparation strategies. Yura Borisov, playing OpenAI co-founder Ilya Sutskever, discovered that he and his subject shared an identical birth date and utilised this coincidence as a conceptual anchor for his performance. Will Angus, portraying Dario Amodei, undertook research into the executive's advocacy for safety measures within AI development, appreciating the opportunity to explore a figure whose prominence within public discourse has since expanded considerably.
Guadagnino's film focuses upon a transformative five-day period in November 2023, when OpenAI's board removed Altman from his executive position, precipitating a staff uprising that secured his reinstatement. The screenplay frames these events as representing a critical juncture at which technological restraint might have been imposed, but financial imperatives and personal grievances amongst industry figures ultimately prevailed. The narrative thus functions as both historical documentation and cautionary commentary on the dynamics shaping artificial intelligence's advancement.
Critical response has been notably affirmative, with observers identifying Artificial as Guadagnino's most substantial achievement since Call Me by Your Name. Particular praise has accrued to Garfield's portrayal, which employs restrained physicality—sustained seated positions, measured vocal delivery, and strategically deployed moments of emotional disengagement—to render a potentially troubling figure sympathetic and compelling. Critics have drawn parallels to Anthony Perkins' iconic interpretation of Norman Bates in Psycho, noting how both performances exploit subtle technique to generate complex audience identification with morally ambiguous protagonists.
Industry speculation regarding Garfield's eligibility for major awards has intensified following the film's premiere, with distributors positioning him prominently within supporting actor discussions. The performance's sophistication and the film's thematic resonance have prompted broader conversations regarding artificial intelligence's societal implications at a moment when such questions have assumed unprecedented urgency.
Where outlets differ
Source 1 prioritises Garfield's acting preparation and methodology (Stanislavski technique, failed prosthetics experiment, interview-based research), whilst Source 2 emphasises critical evaluation and awards potential
Source 1 discusses multiple cast members' preparatory approaches; Source 2 focuses almost exclusively on Garfield's individual performance
Source 1 treats the story as an account of craft and technical preparation; Source 2 frames it through film criticism and comparative cinematic analysis