Rui Pinto received just 10 days’ notice of protection ending
Portuguese authorities took nearly three months to inform whistleblower Rui Pinto that his witness protection status was ending, providing only 10 days' notice. The special security programmes commission decided in July that the threat level against Pinto had decreased and protection was no longer needed, yet kept him in the dark until 30 September. This delay has sparked outrage, with critics questioning whether proper procedures were followed and whether his ongoing cooperation with authorities was adequately considered.
Pinto has been under witness protection since 2020 after providing Portuguese authorities with millions of files that subsequently influenced investigations across Europe, including the Premier League's guilty verdict against Manchester City. The 83-day gap between the decision and notification left him scrambling to find safe accommodation and income whilst avoiding contact with family members. His lawyers have filed an appeal and called the decision "an act of state terrorism", arguing he was not heard before the decision was made, which they contend violates human rights standards.
- Portuguese authorities delayed notifying whistleblower Rui Pinto of protection ending by 83 days
- He received only 10 days' notice before losing witness protection status
- Justice minister now reviewing decision following public outcry and lawyers' appeal
New here? Start with this
Rui Pinto is a Portuguese whistleblower whose leaked files sparked investigations across Europe. His disclosures influenced a Premier League investigation that resulted in Manchester City being found guilty of financial violations. These documents continue to feature in ongoing inquiries across multiple countries.
Because his revelations exposed powerful organisations and individuals, Pinto has been under witness protection since 2020. This security arrangement was designed to keep him safe whilst he cooperated with investigations and avoided potential threats.
Portuguese authorities decided in July that the threat level against Pinto had decreased enough to end his protection, but only notified him nearly three months later. This provided just ten days' notice before his protection was scheduled to end, forcing him to hastily arrange alternative accommodation and means of support. The brief notification period has prompted questions about whether proper procedures were followed and whether his safety was adequately considered.
Both sides, in good faith
The strongest fair case each way — we don't pick a winner.
The case for
Witness protection decisions of this magnitude require rigorous procedural safeguards, including meaningful opportunity for the affected person to be heard before the decision is finalised. The 83-day gap between the July decision and September notification, coupled with just 10 days' notice, left Pinto insufficient time to arrange safe accommodation and income. His substantial and ongoing cooperation with authorities—which generated significant investigations across Europe—does not appear to have been adequately weighed in the decision-making process, raising serious questions about whether he received fair treatment.
The case against
Witness protection programmes must operate on the principle that protection ends when threat assessments, made by specialists with access to classified intelligence, determine the risk has sufficiently diminished. Indefinite protection is neither sustainable nor appropriate; individuals must eventually transition to normal life. The commission's determination that Pinto's threat level had decreased reflects legitimate professional judgment, and even if procedural steps could be refined, this does not negate the sound underlying principle that protection should not persist once genuine danger has passed.
Read the full article at the source →
Originally published by The Guardian as “Portuguese authorities took 83 days to tell Rui Pinto his witness protection was ending”.