← Back to the feed

Oakland’s no-nonsense mayor touts huge drops in crime after woke predecessor who’s now facing FBI charges let chaos and squalor rule

Daily Mail ·

Oakland's new Mayor Barbara Lee has highlighted significant crime reductions during her State of the City address, marking a significant improvement for a city that experienced rising crime under her recalled predecessor, Sheng Thao. Thao was ousted by voters in November 2024 with a 65 percent majority and was subsequently indicted by the FBI on corruption charges including bribery and fraud.

Lee's speech cited a 26 percent fall in burglaries, a 17 percent drop in violent crime, and a 50 percent reduction in gun violence. This marks a striking contrast with the previous administration: under Thao and recalled District Attorney Pamela Price, Oakland experienced a 21 percent surge in overall crime, robberies rose 38 percent and vehicle thefts jumped 45 percent—the city recorded roughly 15,000 stolen cars in 2023, meaning one in every 30 residents had their vehicle stolen.

  • Oakland's new mayor reports major crime drops after predecessor recalled and indicted
  • Burglaries fell 26 percent, violent crime fell 17 percent, gun violence fell 50 percent
  • Previous administration saw crime surge 21 percent; 15,000 cars stolen in 2023

New here? Start with this

Oakland experienced a serious crime crisis in recent years. The city saw vehicle thefts jump 45 per cent, robberies increase 38 per cent, and overall crime surge 21 per cent, with around 15,000 cars stolen in 2023 alone—meaning one in thirty residents had their vehicle taken.

Mayor Sheng Thao, who was in office during this period of rising crime, was recalled by voters in November 2024 with 65 per cent voting to remove him. He subsequently faced FBI indictment on corruption charges including bribery and fraud.

Barbara Lee is now Oakland's Mayor. The city has since reported significant improvements, with notable reductions in burglaries, violent crime, and gun violence compared to the previous period.

Both sides, in good faith

The strongest fair case each way — we don't pick a winner.

The case for

The dramatic crime reductions represent concrete evidence that the new administration's priorities are producing measurably better outcomes for residents. Halving gun violence and nearly eliminating the vehicle theft crisis—which had victimised one in thirty residents annually—constitutes genuine public safety improvement. The voters' clear decision to recall the previous administration by nearly two-to-one reflects their recognition of this difference, and these results justify that electoral choice.

The case against

Crime statistics result from numerous complex factors including policing strategies, economic conditions, national trends, and enforcement priorities, rather than being determined solely by mayoral leadership. Rather than attributing outcomes to ideological framing such as 'woke' or 'no-nonsense,' rigorous analysis requires examining which specific policies actually changed and what their documented effects are. The current administration has been in office for nearly two years, and establishing firm causal links between particular policy changes and crime reduction remains methodologically complex without more detailed investigation into specific policy changes and their measurable impacts.

Elections Politics World

Read the full article at the source →