The New York Times couldn’t ‘corroborate’ abuse claims against Graham Platner, so I called the woman they didn’t. This scandal just got so much worse: KENNEDY

← Back to the feed

The New York Times couldn’t ‘corroborate’ abuse claims against Graham Platner, so I called the woman they didn’t. This scandal just got so much worse: KENNEDY

Daily Mail · 1 month ago

Daily Mail columnist Kennedy attacks a New York Times investigation into Graham Platner, a combat veteran turned socialist candidate whose 2026 Maine Democratic Senate primary campaign has collapsed. The Times reported that three women who had dated Platner described "volatile" and "toxic" relationships, but the columnist argues the paper handled the story dishonestly, and set out to contact an accuser she says the Times underplayed. The piece matters as a partisan critique of both the candidate and the mainstream media's reporting of the scandal.

The article notes that Platner had been endorsed early by senators Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren, even as allegations surfaced of Nazi sympathies, heavy drinking, and racist and misogynist remarks. The columnist highlights that the only on-the-record accuser detailing abuse was Lyndsey Fifield, described by the Times as a Virginia conservative linked to Republican campaigns — framing the columnist reads as an attempt to paint the accuser as politically motivated. Fifield alleged that Platner physically hurt her, including shaking her by the shoulders and leaving marks. The article is an opinion column written in a highly polemical, mocking tone.

  • Socialist Senate candidate Graham Platner's Maine primary campaign has collapsed amid abuse claims.
  • Columnist accuses the New York Times of downplaying its main on-the-record accuser.
  • Accuser Lyndsey Fifield alleges Platner shook her and left marks.

Art Culture Geopolitics Politics World

Read the full article at the source →