‘A complete nightmare’: Airport chaos leaves Brits stranded for 16 hours – and most won’t get a penny back
A major technical failure at National Air Traffic Services (NATS), which handles air traffic control for 15 UK airports, caused widespread flight cancellations and left thousands of passengers stranded, some for up to 16 hours. Disruption began on Tuesday and spread from Heathrow, Gatwick, Manchester and Birmingham to airports across Europe, with most affected travellers unlikely to receive compensation despite the ordeal.
Around 600 flights were cancelled on the first day, and although NATS said it had fixed the issue, chaos persisted the following morning with roughly 250 cancellations at Heathrow and over 190 by British Airways alone. Passengers reported being stuck on planes for up to nine hours without food, and travellers in Rhodes and Milan described long queues, cancelled flights and being rebooked onto delayed or roundabout replacement journeys, with some also facing hours-long delays at e-gates during exit from UK airports.
- NATS technical failure caused mass flight cancellations across UK and Europe
- Passengers stranded up to 16 hours; most face no compensation
- Heathrow, Gatwick hit hardest with hundreds of flights axed
New here? Start with this
Around 15 UK airports rely on National Air Traffic Services (NATS) to manage aircraft in the skies safely, and when its systems fail, flights cannot operate as normal. A technical fault at NATS this week caused widespread disruption, forcing airlines to cancel flights and leaving passengers stuck on planes or in terminals for hours at a time.
The knock-on effects were not limited to Britain. Because aircraft and crews often move between multiple airports in a single day, problems at major UK hubs such as Heathrow and Gatwick quickly delayed and cancelled flights elsewhere in Europe too, affecting travellers who had no direct connection to the UK.
Compensation for flight disruption in the UK and EU is generally only payable when an airline is deemed responsible for the cause of the delay or cancellation. Air traffic control failures are typically classed as "extraordinary circumstances" outside an airline's control, which is why many passengers affected this week are unlikely to be entitled to a payout, even though they still faced long delays and cancelled journeys.
Both sides, in good faith
The strongest fair case each way — we don't pick a winner.
The case for
Passenger advocates argue that thousands of people endured genuine hardship, some stuck on planes for up to nine hours without food or stranded for 16 hours, through no fault of their own, and that the human cost of such disruption should be reflected in meaningful compensation regardless of the technical cause. They contend that airlines and infrastructure operators like NATS profit from a system passengers trust to function reliably, and that when it fails on this scale, the financial burden of delays, missed connections and ruined plans should not fall solely on travellers who had no ability to foresee or avoid the chaos.
The case against
Airlines and regulators counter that compensation rules deliberately exclude payouts for events like air traffic control failures because these are genuinely extraordinary circumstances outside any carrier's control, distinct from operational failures such as crewing or maintenance issues that airlines could reasonably prevent. They argue it would be unfair to penalise airlines financially for a third-party infrastructure failure they did not cause and could not have avoided, especially given airlines are already absorbing substantial costs through rebooking, meals and accommodation, and that expanding liability further could ultimately raise fares for all passengers without addressing the underlying resilience of national air traffic systems.