As a Casual Fan, Here’s How I’d Rank All 7 Harry Potter Books
A Collider writer offers a personal, casual-fan ranking of all seven Harry Potter novels, framed against the series' increasingly complicated legacy. The piece notes that J.K. Rowling's public views and her financial support of causes deemed hateful have made it harder for many readers to separate the books from their author, while her repeated retroactive changes to the story's canon have added to a sense that she has lost a firm grip on the material.
The ranking places "Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix" last, criticised for its length and slow pacing, followed by "Chamber of Secrets", which is described as overstuffed with darker themes that sit awkwardly with its young characters. "Philosopher's Stone" (referred to in the US as "Sorcerer's Stone") appears next, credited as the phenomenon that launched the franchise. The article continues counting down through the remaining titles, offering critical commentary on each book's strengths, weaknesses and how they compare to their film adaptations, though the full list beyond the top five is not included in the provided text.
- Collider writer ranks all seven Harry Potter books from worst to best.
- "Order of the Phoenix" ranked lowest; "Chamber of Secrets" also criticised.
- Piece reflects on Rowling's controversies complicating the series' legacy.