US streaming services now fuel majority of UK television production

← Back to the feed

US streaming services now fuel majority of UK television production

Developing story first seen 2 hours ago

· 2 hours ago

New detail from Pact's latest census shows the UK's independent TV production sector is growing more reliant on global streaming platforms even as its traditional protections come under threat. Chief executive Kate Phillipson-style figurehead David Warner, presenting the figures for the first time since succeeding long-serving John McVay, revealed that subscription streamers such as Netflix, Prime Video and Disney+ now account for 72.3% of all primary commissions from outside the UK, up from just 27% a decade ago. This shift matters because it coincides with mounting pressure on the "Terms of Trade" rules that have let independent producers retain rights to shows commissioned by British broadcasters since 2003 — protections now being questioned as Channel 4 explores an in-house production arm, Sky moves to acquire ITV, and the BBC's director-general queries whether the rules remain fit for purpose.

The Pact Census recorded UK broadcaster spend falling 4.7% to £1.99 billion, its lowest level since 2020, while total sector revenue rose 4.1% to £3.81 billion — its second-highest figure ever, behind only 2022. International revenue climbed 15.8% to £1.57 billion, now 41.1% of the total, while non-TV revenue (covering publishing, talent management and film) hit a record £258 million and the secondary rights market grew by £65 million to £575 million. Warner warned this growing dependence on rights revenue and international finance reflects genuine strain on domestic commissioning, and said Pact remains in "continual discussions" with broadcasters to safeguard the Terms of Trade, citing a new agreement reached with Paramount's Channel 5 in March.

  • Streamers now drive 72.3% of UK producers' overseas commissions, up from 27%
  • Domestic broadcaster spend falls to £1.99bn, lowest since 2020
  • Producer rights protections face new threats from Channel 4, Sky-ITV, BBC

New here? Start with this

Tv shows made by British production companies are increasingly funded and commissioned by American streaming giants like Netflix, Prime Video and Disney+, rather than by traditional UK broadcasters such as the BBC, ITV and Channel 4. This matters because British television has long relied on a system where independent production companies make programmes for domestic broadcasters while keeping ownership of the rights, which allows them to earn money from selling shows abroad.

The organisation that represents these independent producers, called Pact, publishes an annual census tracking where the money in the industry comes from. Its findings feed into a wider debate about whether long-standing rules protecting British producers still make sense at a time when broadcasters themselves are under financial pressure, facing changes in ownership and considering new ways of making programmes in-house.

This shift matters to viewers and the industry alike because it affects what kind of British programming gets made, who owns it, and whether money generated by successful shows stays within the UK production sector or flows increasingly to overseas platforms.

Both sides, in good faith

The strongest fair case each way — we don't pick a winner.

The case for

Independent producers and their trade body make the case that the Terms of Trade introduced in 2003 have been a genuine British success story, allowing production companies to retain rights to the shows they make and build sustainable businesses on the back of international sales, formats and secondary revenue rather than relying solely on broadcaster commissions. They argue this rights retention is precisely why the sector has grown resilient enough to weather falling domestic broadcaster spend, diversifying into publishing, talent management and overseas finance, and that unpicking these protections now would strip smaller and regional producers of the leverage that lets them compete with much larger streaming platforms and vertically integrated broadcasters.

The case against

Broadcasters exploring changes, including Channel 4's interest in an in-house production arm and a consolidating ITV/Sky landscape, argue that rules designed two decades ago for a pre-streaming market may no longer reflect commercial reality now that subscription platforms dominate commissioning and international finance. From this perspective, public service broadcasters that fund content but cannot retain its rights are increasingly disadvantaged against deep-pocketed streamers and each other, and reforming the Terms of Trade could let them build the scale, owned intellectual property and long-term investment capacity needed to keep commissioning UK content at all as traditional revenues decline.

Coverage

Americas Entertainment TV UK World

Read the full article at the source →