US streaming services now fuel majority of UK television production

Developed over time first seen 2 months ago

·

Revenue for Britain's independent television producers reached its second-highest total on record in 2025, even as spending from UK broadcasters fell below £2 billion for the first time since 2020. The figures, published by industry body Pact, underline a decisive shift in the balance of power within British television, with global subscription streamers such as Netflix, Prime Video and Disney+ now driving the bulk of international commissions, while traditional public service broadcasters face sustained financial pressure and difficult choices about future output.

Pact's census showed UK television revenue fell 4.7% to £1.99 billion, but this was offset by international TV revenue rising 15.8% to £1.57 billion and non-TV revenue climbing to a record £258 million, pushing overall revenue up 4.1% to £3.81 billion. Subscription streamers accounted for 72.3% of all primary commissions from outside the UK, up from just 27% a decade ago, according to chief executive David Warner, who was presenting the figures for the first time since succeeding long-serving predecessor John McVay. Warner warned domestic broadcaster commissions had fallen for a third consecutive year, squeezing small and mid-sized producers, and cautioned that the "Terms of Trade" rules protecting producers' rights since 2003 face mounting scrutiny as Channel 4 explores an in-house production arm, Sky moves to acquire ITV, and the BBC questions whether the rules remain fit for purpose.

Sources
2
Outlets
2
Left · Centre · Right
0 · 0 · 0

In short

  • Global streamers now dominate UK independent TV production commissions
  • UK broadcaster spend fell below £2bn for first time since 2020
  • Producer rights protections face growing pressure from industry changes

How this story developed

  • 2 months ago Coverage of the same census widened its focus to the headline £3.81 billion sector total, framing American streaming investment as the near-sole driver of that 4.1% growth while domestic broadcaster commissioning sank below £2 billion for the first time since 2020.
  • 2 months ago The Pact census showed independent UK producers earning 72.3% of overseas commissions from subscription streamers, up from 27% a decade ago, while broadcaster spend fell 4.7% to £1.99 billion against Terms of Trade protections now under threat.

Where outlets differ

From the full account, which is AI-written from the sources:

Framing of the headline figure: one account stresses that overall sector revenue is the second-highest on record (behind 2022), while the other emphasises the growth rate and streaming's role in driving it.

The two reports cite the domestic decline slightly differently — one frames it as UK broadcaster spend falling below £2bn for the first time in five years, the other as the first time since 2020, though both point to the same underlying figures (roughly £1.99bn, down 4.7% from about £2.09bn).

One source highlights a specific statistic that subscription streamers accounted for 72.3% of all primary commissions from outside the UK (worth about £916m), up from around 27% a decade ago, and draws a historical contrast with 2010s-era cable network commissioning — detail largely absent from the other account, which instead focuses on the share of PSB network commissions falling to 58%.

The programme examples used to illustrate streaming investment differ: one cites 'The Gentlemen', 'Black Doves', 'Clarkson's Farm' and 'L.O.L. Last One Laughing UK', while the other highlights 'Adolescence' and 'Agatha Christie's Seven Dials'.

One report gives additional causal detail for the international revenue rebound, noting post-Hollywood-strike recovery and a rebound in finished-tape sales following a sharp decline in 2024 caused by production backlogs — context not mentioned in the other account.

Emphasis on the BBC funding warning differs: one report foregrounds Pact's caution against the BBC facing 'managed decline' as a headline concern, while the other includes it within a fuller quote calling for a new BBC settlement alongside broader remarks on regional investment and support for smaller indies.

Figures for non-TV and secondary rights revenue are presented differently (absolute totals and prior-year comparisons in one account versus percentage/monetary growth increments in the other), though the underlying numbers are consistent.

Steelman: both sides, in good faith

The strongest fair case each way — we don't pick a winner.

The case for

Independent producers and their trade body make the case that the Terms of Trade introduced in 2003 have been a genuine British success story, allowing production companies to retain rights to the shows they make and build sustainable businesses on the back of international sales, formats and secondary revenue rather than relying solely on broadcaster commissions. They argue this rights retention is precisely why the sector has grown resilient enough to weather falling domestic broadcaster spend, diversifying into publishing, talent management and overseas finance, and that unpicking these protections now would strip smaller and regional producers of the leverage that lets them compete with much larger streaming platforms and vertically integrated broadcasters.

The case against

Broadcasters exploring changes, including Channel 4's interest in an in-house production arm and a consolidating ITV/Sky landscape, argue that rules designed two decades ago for a pre-streaming market may no longer reflect commercial reality now that subscription platforms dominate commissioning and international finance. From this perspective, public service broadcasters that fund content but cannot retain its rights are increasingly disadvantaged against deep-pocketed streamers and each other, and reforming the Terms of Trade could let them build the scale, owned intellectual property and long-term investment capacity needed to keep commissioning UK content at all as traditional revenues decline.

Explained simply

Tv shows made by British production companies are increasingly funded and commissioned by American streaming giants like Netflix, Prime Video and Disney+, rather than by traditional UK broadcasters such as the BBC, ITV and Channel 4. This matters because British television has long relied on a system where independent production companies make programmes for domestic broadcasters while keeping ownership of the rights, which allows them to earn money from selling shows abroad.

The organisation that represents these independent producers, called Pact, publishes an annual census tracking where the money in the industry comes from. Its findings feed into a wider debate about whether long-standing rules protecting British producers still make sense at a time when broadcasters themselves are under financial pressure, facing changes in ownership and considering new ways of making programmes in-house.

This shift matters to viewers and the industry alike because it affects what kind of British programming gets made, who owns it, and whether money generated by successful shows stays within the UK production sector or flows increasingly to overseas platforms.

Coverage · 2 sources

Americas Entertainment TV UK World

Read the full article at the source →

Log in to join the discussion