Digger campaign reframes poor reviews as proof of artistic ambition
Tom Cruise's film "Digger", directed by Alejandro González Iñárritu, has received poor critical reviews, prompting its producers to launch a provocative new marketing campaign. The ad features Cruise dismissing critics and rebranding the mixed reception as evidence of the film's divisiveness rather than genuine weakness, arguing that audiences should form their own opinions. This strategy attempts to shift the narrative around negative reviews in an industry where aggregated scores significantly influence box office performance and Oscar prospects.
The campaign repurposes fragmentary negative reviews alongside positive adjectives ("UNPLEASANT – MASTERPIECE", "BAFFLING – BRILLIANT") to suggest critical disagreement indicates artistic merit. This echoes Francis Ford Coppola's ill-fated "Megalopolis" campaign, which infamously quoted fabricated reviews and faced severe backlash. The fundamental problem, however, is that "Digger" was never intended to be divisive—it was positioned as a sophisticated, glamorous prestige film with progressive values designed for broad appeal. The critic contends that producers should simply ignore negative reviews and let the film speak for itself.
- Film launches controversial 'divisiveness not failure' marketing campaign to counter poor reviews
- Strategy echoes failed Coppola approach by conflating critical disagreement with artistic merit
- Prestige film's original broad-appeal positioning undermined by divisiveness narrative
Read the full article at the source →
Originally published by The Guardian as “Don’t hate the movie, hate the critic! Digger’s new PR push is a risky bet for film that was never meant to be divisive”.