London ‘billionaires’ row’ copes admirably with record-breaking drought as gardens remain an oasis of green

← Back to the feed

London ‘billionaires’ row’ copes admirably with record-breaking drought as gardens remain an oasis of green

Daily Mail · 3 hours ago

An affluent London street nicknamed the "billionaires' row" has managed to keep its gardens lush and green despite a record-breaking drought affecting much of Britain this summer. The report highlights a contrast between the well-maintained greenery in this wealthy enclave and the wider dry conditions seen across the country, raising questions about water use and resources among London's richest residents.

Specific details of how the gardens have been kept green, such as irrigation methods or water sources, are not fully outlined in the available material. The piece appears within wider Daily Mail coverage of Britain's drought, which has also included reports of wildfires and forecasts of upcoming torrential rain in parched areas of the country.

  • Wealthy London street's gardens stay green despite record drought
  • Highlights contrast with wider water shortages across Britain
  • Comes amid broader coverage of drought and wildfire conditions

Both sides, in good faith

The strongest fair case each way — we don't pick a winner.

The case for

Those defending the greenery point out that maintaining a garden with water one has legally paid for, drawn from a private borehole, or collected and stored in advance is not a crime but a matter of personal property and responsible planning; if no hosepipe ban has been breached, residents are simply exercising a lawful choice, and singling out a street for its wealth risks punishing prudence and investment in resilient gardening rather than any actual wrongdoing. They would also argue that individual garden-watering is a minor factor compared with agricultural and industrial water use, and that resentment aimed at visible affluence distracts from the real infrastructural and policy failures behind Britain's water shortages, such as leakage and underinvestment by water companies.

The case against

Critics would argue that during a record-breaking drought, when many households face hosepipe bans and farmers and ordinary gardeners watch their own gardens wither, the sight of one of London's wealthiest streets remaining lush sends a troubling message about fairness and shared sacrifice, regardless of the strict legality of the water source. They would say that in a time of collective hardship, visible extravagance by the very rich – whether through private tankers, boreholes, or simply the ability to pay for whatever water is needed – undermines public trust and solidarity, and that those with the greatest means arguably bear a proportionally greater responsibility to model restraint precisely because their example, and their impact on strained public resources, carries more weight.

World

Read the full article at the source →