Meghan Markle’s acting U-turn exposes ‘lingering problem’ after six years of reinventions: experts
Meghan Markle is reportedly in early discussions about joining the third series of Guy Ritchie’s *The Gentlemen*, despite previous reports that the opportunity had ended. Commentators quoted by Fox News argue that a substantial return to acting would revive questions about her professional identity after several post-royal ventures, while potentially offering a high-profile route back into scripted television.
No agreement has been finalised and it is not known how many episodes she might appear in. Markle made a small cameo as herself in the forthcoming Amazon MGM comedy *Close Personal Friends*, but a role in the UK-filmed *The Gentlemen* would be a more significant acting return since leaving *Suits*; reports also linked the prospect to the Sussexes’ planned extended UK stay this autumn.
- Markle is reportedly considering a role in *The Gentlemen*.
- Any deal remains unconfirmed and at an early stage.
- Commentators say it could reopen questions about her career direction.
New here? Start with this
Meghan Markle became widely known as an actor in the legal drama Suits before marrying Prince Harry in 2018. The couple stepped back from royal duties in 2020 and now live in California, where they have pursued media, business and charitable projects.
The Gentlemen is a crime-comedy television series created by British filmmaker Guy Ritchie and linked to his 2019 film of the same name. A substantial scripted role would place Markle back in a field she left before joining the Royal Family, while also drawing attention to how her public career has developed since then.
Both sides, in good faith
The strongest fair case each way — we don't pick a winner.
The case for
A substantial role in The Gentlemen could be a sensible, credible return to a profession Meghan Markle built before royal life. Supporters may argue that a scripted television role allows her to pursue creative work on her own merits, broadens her professional options and demonstrates that people can change direction without being judged as inconsistent. A high-profile production could also give her a clear, bounded project rather than requiring every post-royal venture to define her entire identity.
The case against
Critics may reasonably contend that another major change of direction would reinforce uncertainty about Markle’s long-term professional focus after several different post-royal initiatives. They may argue that a return to acting, particularly in a prominent UK production, could blur the public distinction she has sought between her private royal connection, commercial ventures and entertainment career. From this perspective, the concern is not that she should be barred from acting, but that sustained clarity and commitment to a chosen path are important for public credibility and business partnerships.