# Michigan election: How Abdul El-Sayed’s critics smeared his defence of Palestinians as ‘hate’

- URL: https://talkfuse.com/story/michigan-election-how-abdul-el-sayeds-critics-smeared-his-defence-of-palestinians-as-hate/
- Published: 2026-11-10T18:59:51+00:00
- Updated: 2026-11-10T20:49:40+00:00
- Original publisher: Middle East Eye (publisher lean: Left)
- Original article: https://www.middleeasteye.net/opinion/michigan-election-how-abdul-el-sayeds-critics-smeared-his-defence-palestinians-hate
- Topics: Americas, Elections, Government, Middle East, Politics, World

## Key points

- El-Sayed challenged the use of “hate” as a campaign accusation.
- Researchers counted 38,280 Islamophobic posts naming him.
- The article argues accusations carried unequal political costs.

## Summary

Abdulrahman El-Sayed’s victory speech used the word “hate” to challenge accusations made against him during Michigan’s Senate campaign and to argue that defending Palestinians is an expression of care, not hostility. The article examines how accusations of hate shaped the contest and says they carried different consequences depending on whether they were aimed at El-Sayed or his critics.

Republican Mike Rogers repeatedly described El-Sayed’s views as hateful, while President Donald Trump accused him of hating Jews and Black people. An independent political action committee’s advert linked grocery prices with US military aid to Israel; former Democratic rival Haley Stevens said it blamed Israel and Jews. Researchers counted 38,280 Islamophobic posts naming El-Sayed between January and August, and Michigan’s Council on American-Islamic Relations reported three death threats in three days after an anti-Muslim protest in Dearborn.

---
Summarised by TalkFuse (https://talkfuse.com/). Quote the original publisher for the reporting and link this page for the summary and discussion.