Peter Hitchens uses his column to question the evidence given by a key witness in the Lucy Letby case, suggesting police may have helped that witness revise his account after new facts undermined his original story. The piece forms part of Hitchens' long-running campaign challenging the safety of Letby's convictions for murdering and harming babies at the Countess of Chester Hospital, arguing that flaws in the prosecution case, including witness testimony, have not been adequately scrutinised.

The article focuses on alleged inconsistencies in a witness statement central to the case against Letby, implying that changes made to the evidence coincided with police involvement once contradictory facts emerged. As an opinion column, it reflects Hitchens' personal analysis and campaigning stance rather than new official findings, and does not appear to present a formal police or judicial response to the claims raised.