The article content could not be retrieved. The text supplied contains only a browser verification/anti-bot message ("Just a moment… Enable JavaScript and cookies to continue") rather than the substance of the piece, so there is nothing to summarise. I will not invent a summary, as doing so would risk misrepresenting what the author actually argued.

Based on the headline alone, the piece from National Review appears to concern the legal doctrine of stare decisis (the principle that courts should follow precedent) as it relates to dissenting opinions in a birthright citizenship case. However, no details, arguments, figures or context are available in the provided text, so this cannot be confirmed. To produce an accurate summary, the full article text would need to be supplied, or the page fetched successfully.