Suno unveils copyright-compliant music AI models with major record label backing

← Back to the feed

Suno unveils copyright-compliant music AI models with major record label backing

Developing story first seen 2 hours ago

· 2 hours ago

Suno has launched its v6 AI music model suite, its first "built in partnership with the music industry," and revealed plans for future remixing and sampling products using participating labels' catalogues. The launch follows a fresh licensing deal with French label group Believe, agreed just hours earlier, joining existing partners Warner Music Group and BMG whose music, alongside "user inputs," was used to train the new models. Suno CEO Mikey Shulman explained the process relies on users implicitly rating song pairs, which the company uses to refine what makes tracks "catchy" and "good," while product chief Jack Dolby stressed that label payments are for the wider partnership rather than for supplying training data.

The rollout comprises three products, v6, v6 Wild and v6 Mini, all pitched as Suno's fastest and highest-quality models yet, replacing retired earlier versions; downloads of older tracks were already restricted from 3 September under terms first set out in the WMG deal. New features include editing songs with plain-language instructions, building mashups from multiple sources, and generating music from text, audio, images or video. Suno, valued at $5.4 billion, still faces numerous lawsuits, including from Universal Music Group and Sony Music (filed 2024), a class action led by Jason Isbell, Mexican label Gerencia 360 Music, and Round Hill Music, and its product chief has confirmed v6's training data excludes UMG and Sony material.

  • Suno launches v6 AI music models with Believe, WMG and BMG backing
  • New models to enable remixing and sampling of partner labels' music
  • Suno still faces multiple copyright lawsuits, including from UMG and Sony

New here? Start with this

Suno is a company that makes software able to generate original songs from a text prompt, using artificial intelligence trained on large amounts of existing music. Its new v6 models have been launched with backing from three major rights holders, Warner Music Group, BMG and Believe, who have agreed licensing deals allowing their music to be used in training. This matters because AI music tools have been controversial, with record labels and artists arguing that earlier systems were built by using copyrighted songs without permission or payment.

Suno is still fighting several legal battles over how its older models were trained. Universal Music Group and Sony Music, two of the biggest labels in the world, are suing the company in the United States and are not part of the new licensing arrangement, while further claims have come from music rights organisations in Germany, Denmark and Canada, a publisher, and a group of musicians including Jason Isbell. These disputes centre on whether AI companies need permission to use copyrighted recordings and performers' identities, an issue that affects the wider music industry as it works out how to respond to generative AI.

Both sides, in good faith

The strongest fair case each way — we don't pick a winner.

The case for

Suno's supporters would argue that this launch represents genuine, meaningful progress: securing licensing agreements with Warner Music Group, BMG and Believe, retiring the older models trained without such deals, and building v6 from the ground up on licensed data and internal research shows a company taking rightsholders' concerns seriously and choosing the harder, slower path of negotiated partnership over continued legal confrontation. They would note that building sustainable commercial relationships with major rightsholders, rather than relying solely on contested fair-use arguments, is precisely the kind of industry-led solution critics of AI have long demanded, and that no company can resolve every legacy dispute overnight.

The case against

Sceptics would counter that the rebrand as "copyright-compliant" is premature and potentially misleading given that Universal Music Group and Sony Music remain active plaintiffs, GEMA has already won a ruling against Suno, and further claims are pending from Koda, SOCAN, Round Hill Music and musicians including Jason Isbell. They would argue that partial admissions regarding circumvention of YouTube's anti-downloading protections raise serious questions about how the earlier models' training data was actually obtained, and that presenting a company still facing a wide array of unresolved infringement allegations as having achieved compliance risks understating the scale of harm claimed by artists and rightsholders who have not yet reached agreements with Suno.

Coverage

AI Art Business Celebrity Companies Culture Entertainment Markets Music Technology

Read the full article at the source →