The 2004 movie so bad it insulted Roger Ebert: “To call it an anticlimax would be an insult”

← Back to the feed

The 2004 movie so bad it insulted Roger Ebert: “To call it an anticlimax would be an insult”

Far Out · 4 hours ago

Far Out examines Roger Ebert’s strongly negative response to M. Night Shyamalan’s 2004 thriller *The Village*. It matters because Ebert, who had previously admired Shyamalan’s work, regarded the film’s central twist as undermining its atmosphere and story rather than providing a satisfying conclusion.

The film follows an isolated 19th-century-style community frightened by creatures said to live in the surrounding woods. Ebert gave it one star, calling it a “colossal miscalculation” and directing most of his criticism at its revelation, which he considered unoriginal and deeply anticlimactic; the article contrasts this with the effectiveness of Shyamalan’s earlier twists in *The Sixth Sense* and *Unbreakable*.

  • Ebert gave *The Village* one star.
  • He thought its twist ruined the film.
  • The review contrasts it with Shyamalan’s earlier successes.

Entertainment Film

Read the full article at the source →