The ‘terrible’ metal albums (that aren’t nearly as bad as people make out)

← Back to the feed

The ‘terrible’ metal albums (that aren’t nearly as bad as people make out)

Louder · 3 hours ago

A feature on the music site Loudersound revisits several metal albums that are widely dismissed as career missteps, arguing that critical and fan consensus has been unfair to them. The piece runs through records by bands including Iron Maiden, Metallica, Slayer and Guns N' Roses, making the case that reputations built on first impressions or contextual backlash don't hold up when the albums are reassessed today. This kind of contrarian retrospective matters to fans because it challenges received wisdom about "untouchable" bands and encourages listeners to revisit records they may have written off.

The article's first main example is Slayer's 1998 album Diabolus In Musica, often maligned as a cynical attempt to chase the nu metal trend led by bands like Korn and Limp Bizkit, a view reinforced by guitarist Kerry King's own public disdain for the record. The writer counters that tracks such as Perversions Of Pain, Stain Of Mind and Love To Hate retain Slayer's core traits, Tom Araya's vocals and the King-Hanneman guitar interplay, and owe more to industrial-leaning acts like Prong and Godflesh than to nu metal. The piece also flags Iron Maiden's mid-1980s shift towards longer, more progressive songs, starting with 1984's Powerslave and continuing through Somewhere In Time and Seventh Son Of A Seventh Son, as a turning point that drew criticism at the time.

  • Loudersound reassesses metal albums long dismissed as "bad" or misguided.
  • Slayer's Diabolus In Musica defended against nu metal comparisons despite Kerry King's own criticism.
  • Iron Maiden's 1980s prog shift, starting with Powerslave, also discussed.

Entertainment Music

Read the full article at the source →