← Back to the feed

The “worst” band Mick Jagger and Henry Rollins both hated: “The worst rhythm section ever”

Far Out ·

Henry Rollins and Mick Jagger both criticised U2, questioning whether the band deserved its stadium status. Rollins attacked their musicianship and Bono’s performance, while Jagger said U2 seemed to apologise for staging large-scale shows.

The article contrasts those views with U2’s aim of connecting with audiences and conveying a message through their songs. It notes that the band’s music and presentation are not to everyone’s taste, but argues their conviction and passion helped make them successful.

  • Rollins disparaged U2’s musicianship and Bono’s singing.
  • Jagger questioned whether U2 were truly suited to stadiums.
  • The article says their conviction helped them connect with fans.

New here? Start with this

U2 are an Irish rock band formed in Dublin in 1976, with Bono as lead singer and The Edge on guitar. Their songs often combine personal themes with political or social messages, and their concerts are known for large stages and visual effects.

The band became one of the world’s most successful live acts, drawing huge audiences to stadiums. Their scale and style have also attracted criticism, including questions about their musicianship and whether the shows can feel overly grand.

The contrasting views of Henry Rollins and Mick Jagger reflect a wider debate about what makes a rock band compelling: musical skill, performance, spectacle or the connection with an audience. U2’s long career and following show that their approach has resonated with many listeners, even though it does not appeal to everyone.

Both sides, in good faith

The strongest fair case each way — we don't pick a winner.

The case for

U2’s supporters can argue that stadium success rests on more than technical virtuosity: memorable songs, a strong live connection and a coherent artistic purpose can matter just as much. The band’s conviction and willingness to pair large-scale shows with messages have resonated with audiences, making their performances meaningful to many fans.

The case against

Critics can argue that a band celebrated on this scale should be judged on its musicianship and live performance, not only its ambitions or popularity. Rollins questioned U2’s playing and Bono’s delivery, while Jagger saw their apparent unease with grand staging as undermining the spectacle; for listeners who value musical precision or confident showmanship, those are fair grounds for criticism.

Entertainment Music

Read the full article at the source →

Cookie-free view counts · Privacy choices

We count page views to improve this website, including before you choose optional analytics. This counter keeps only a daily total: no visitor IDs, page addresses or browsing histories. It uses no tracking cookies and sends no data to Google or Microsoft. Optional analytics add richer reports if you accept them.

Your choice is remembered using a preference cookie. Rejecting analytics, Do Not Track and Global Privacy Control also stop this counter. Ordinary server access logs are separate.