Tony Romo hit with several new citations after OWI arrest, further jeopardizing return to NFL broadcasts
Former Dallas Cowboys quarterback Tony Romo has reportedly received further traffic and alcohol-related citations following his July arrest in Milwaukee for allegedly operating a vehicle while intoxicated. The development could further complicate any return to his role as a CBS NFL broadcaster, after the network placed him on leave while the case is assessed.
Court records reportedly list first-offence OWI, unsafe passing on the right, and possession of open intoxicants in a vehicle. Romo’s spokesperson said he accepts responsibility and described the matter as civil rather than criminal; he is due in court in September, while CBS says no timetable or final decision has been made on his broadcasting future.
- Romo reportedly faces additional citations after his July OWI arrest.
- CBS has kept him on leave pending assessment.
- His court appearance is scheduled for September.
New here? Start with this
Tony Romo is a former American football quarterback best known for playing for the Dallas Cowboys. Since retiring as a player, he has worked as a television analyst for CBS, helping explain NFL games to viewers during live broadcasts.
OWI is the term used in Wisconsin for operating a vehicle while intoxicated, a driving offence involving alcohol or other substances. Traffic citations can be handled through civil or criminal processes depending on the alleged offence and a person’s record.
Broadcasters are often expected to meet standards set by their employers, particularly when allegations may affect public confidence. Any decision about Romo’s television role is separate from the court process, which determines how the citations are dealt with.
Both sides, in good faith
The strongest fair case each way — we don't pick a winner.
The case for
CBS could reasonably conclude that keeping Romo off air while the case is resolved protects the credibility of its NFL coverage and signals that alleged drink-driving is treated seriously. Supporters of this approach would argue that a prominent broadcaster has a public-facing responsibility, and that multiple reported traffic and alcohol-related citations make a temporary leave proportionate while the facts are examined.
The case against
Others could argue that Romo should not face a professional penalty beyond what the legal process determines, particularly where the reported matter is described as a civil first offence and has not yet been resolved in court. They would stress due process, the possibility of rehabilitation and the distinction between personal misconduct and his ability to perform broadcasting work, favouring a decision based on established facts rather than reputational pressure.