Trump says Netanyahu needs to be re-elected, or else US will have to ‘finish the job’ against Iran alone
Donald Trump has endorsed Benjamin Netanyahu and his Likud Party ahead of Israel’s 27 October election, arguing that Netanyahu should remain prime minister as Israel and the United States confront Iran. Trump said that if Israel chose another leader, the US might have to continue the campaign against Iran alone, a commitment he said he was reluctant to make.
Netanyahu thanked Trump for his support and said the two would complete their mission together. The election determines the balance of the 120-seat Knesset, which in turn shapes the next government: a candidate needs backing from at least 61 members to form a coalition. Forecasts put Likud at 18–22 seats and the broader Netanyahu-aligned bloc at about 49–51, short of a majority.
- Trump endorsed Netanyahu before Israel’s 27 October election.
- He warned the US might act against Iran without Israel’s support.
- Forecasts put Netanyahu’s bloc below the 61-seat majority needed.
New here? Start with this
Israel’s parliament is called the Knesset and has 120 seats. After an election, parties usually join together to form a coalition government; a prime minister needs the support of at least 61 members.
Benjamin Netanyahu leads Likud, one of Israel’s political parties, and has served as prime minister for several periods. Donald Trump is the US president. Israel and the United States are close partners, and both governments have been involved in conflict with Iran.
The election matters because its outcome will shape which parties can form Israel’s next government and who leads it. The relationship between that government and the United States may affect how the two countries approach Iran.
Both sides, in good faith
The strongest fair case each way — we don't pick a winner.
The case for
Supporters could argue that Netanyahu’s experience and close relationship with Trump offer continuity and coordination at a time when both countries are confronting Iran. They may see a stable Israeli government and a clear US commitment as strengthening deterrence and making joint action more effective.
The case against
Critics could argue that an American president should not use the prospect of US military action to influence another country’s election, especially when that action could carry serious risks for both countries. They may also contend that Israelis should choose their government on its own merits and that policy towards Iran should rest on durable national interests, not on the tenure of one leader.