Viral video of homeless encampment around city of Berkeley sparks safety concerns from parent
A video showing a homeless encampment near UC Berkeley-affiliated student housing has prompted concern from a parent and wider discussion about safety and living conditions in the area. Although the housing complex is in Albany rather than on the main Berkeley campus, the episode highlights the regular presence of encampments that students and nearby businesses say affects daily life.
UC Berkeley said the encampment is not on university property and directed concerns to the City of Berkeley. A student said homeless people are a routine sight on his walk to class, while a local business owner reported litter, needles, human waste, threats to staff and reduced family visits; she called for the encampment to be cleared permanently.
- Viral video raises concerns near UC Berkeley housing.
- University says the site is outside its jurisdiction.
- Students and businesses report ongoing safety and sanitation issues.
New here? Start with this
Berkeley and neighbouring Albany are cities in the San Francisco Bay Area, close to the University of California, Berkeley. The university has housing and other facilities in the wider area, so students may live or travel through places outside the main campus.
Like many cities in California, Berkeley has a visible homelessness crisis, with people living in tents, vehicles and temporary encampments. The causes include high housing costs, shortages of affordable homes, mental health needs and substance use, although people’s circumstances vary.
Responsibility can be split between the university and local authorities depending on who owns the land. City officials must balance public safety, sanitation and access to streets with legal protections and the need to offer shelter or other services to people living in encampments.
Both sides, in good faith
The strongest fair case each way — we don't pick a winner.
The case for
Those calling for the encampment to be cleared argue that public authorities have a duty to keep routes near student housing, schools and businesses safe, clean and usable. They contend that reports of needles, waste, threatening behaviour and reduced access for families should be taken seriously, while leaving people in makeshift camps also exposes vulnerable residents to unsafe and unhealthy conditions. On this view, decisive action paired with genuinely available shelter, health care and housing support is both a public-safety measure and a humane response.
The case against
Those wary of clearance operations argue that encampments are a visible consequence of severe housing shortages, poverty and unmet mental-health or addiction needs, rather than a problem that can be solved by moving people elsewhere. They fear that permanent clearances without stable, voluntary alternatives merely displace people, disrupt support networks and can lead to lost possessions or greater danger. On this view, authorities should address specific harmful conduct and sanitation concerns while prioritising long-term housing and services over enforcement-led solutions.