John Healey’s appointment as chancellor signals one clear priority for the new prime minister

The Independent ·

Andy Burnham has appointed John Healey as chancellor in a surprise move that marks the first major decision of his premiership, bypassing the widely tipped favourite, Shabana Mahmood. The choice suggests Burnham wants to avoid the factional splits that dogged the previous government, opting for a respected figure seen as a compromise between the party's left and centre rather than a candidate closely tied to either faction.

Mahmood, who had appeared a near-certain pick, stays on as home secretary, retaining a tough stance on immigration, while Ed Miliband takes charge of reforming the Foreign Office, including plans to restore international aid. Healey, who resigned as defence secretary under Keir Starmer over a £13bn defence funding shortfall, previously criticised the Treasury for treating defence as a drain on spending rather than a driver of growth, and his appointment is seen as a signal that defence funding will be prioritised. He previously served as economic and financial secretary to the Treasury under Gordon Brown, and a Downing Street source said Burnham and Healey share a focus on economic stability, reindustrialisation, devolution and easing the cost-of-living crisis.

In short

  • Burnham names John Healey as chancellor, snubbing favourite Shabana Mahmood
  • Mahmood stays home secretary; Miliband gets Foreign Office reform role
  • Healey's past Treasury criticism hints defence spending will be a priority

Steelman: both sides, in good faith

The strongest fair case each way — we don't pick a winner.

The case for

Healey's appointment signals that the government views defence investment as a genuine economic driver for high-value manufacturing, engineering and industrial jobs. His selection of a respected, unifying figure with Treasury and defence expertise suggests Burnham intends to pursue stable, competent governance whilst pursuing comprehensive reindustrialisation that strengthens both economic and national capability.

The case against

Whilst Healey brings genuine experience, his elevation as the flagship economic figure raises questions about priority when constituents face cost-of-living crises and the NHS struggles with capacity. Critics argue this signals misaligned priorities and that reindustrialisation might be better served through diversified investment across green energy, healthcare and public services rather than defence-focused strategy.

Explained simply

Andy Burnham is the new prime minister and has appointed John Healey as chancellor in his first major decision. This was unexpected, as many people had anticipated Shabana Mahmood would take the role instead.

Healey's appointment appears designed to avoid the internal party divisions that weakened the previous government. He is viewed as a respected figure who appeals across different parts of the Labour party, rather than being closely associated with either the left or the centre faction.

Healey previously resigned as defence secretary citing insufficient defence funding, and his appointment as chancellor signals that the new government intends to prioritise spending on defence. Burnham and Healey are understood to share a focus on economic stability, rebuilding Britain's industries, and addressing the cost-of-living crisis.

Art Culture Government Politics

Read the full article at the source →

Log in to join the discussion