‘Weekday games were amazing’: pubs toast extra £150m in World Cup sales
Pubs across England enjoyed their best football-related sales boost in recent years thanks to England's run to the semi-final of an expanded World Cup, combined with extended late-night opening hours. The uplift, confirmed by multiple industry sources, outstripped that seen during previous tournaments including England's run to the Euro 2024 final, offering rare relief to a hospitality sector that had been closing at a rate of one pub a day in England and Wales.
The British Beer & Pubs Association said pubs sold 30m extra pints over the tournament, generating £150m in added sales, while payments provider Dojo recorded a 16% rise in sales overall, 9% better than during Euro 2024. The standout moment was England's early-morning match against Mexico, when sales almost doubled, aided by pubs being allowed to trade through the night. The boost coincided with a £100m government aid package announced by Andy Burnham, including a 20% cut in business rates, though publicans noted that quieter days between matches and rising costs, such as extra screens and equipment, offset some of the gains.
- World Cup and late openings drove England's biggest pub sales boost in years
- Pubs sold 30m extra pints, adding £150m in sales overall
- Boost coincided with Andy Burnham's £100m aid package and rates cut
Both sides, in good faith
The strongest fair case each way — we don't pick a winner.
The case for
Supporters of the government's intervention argue that targeted measures such as the 20% business rates cut and the £100m aid package are a sensible and proportionate response to a hospitality sector in genuine crisis, evidenced by pubs closing at a rate of one a day across England and Wales. They see the World Cup sales boost as proof that pubs remain vital community and economic assets worth protecting, and argue that temporary relief on costs, combined with permissive extended licensing for major events, allows publicans to capitalise fully on rare moments of high demand rather than being constrained by rigid rules. For these advocates, public support here is not a bailout but an investment in jobs, high streets and social infrastructure that markets alone will not sustain through quieter periods.
The case against
Sceptics of relying on such support argue that a one-off tournament-driven spike, however welcome, is not a substitute for addressing the structural pressures, such as energy costs, business rates baseline levels, and changing drinking habits, that are driving the long-term decline in pub numbers. They caution that business rates cuts and aid packages represent a cost to taxpayers or foregone public revenue that provides only short-term relief while doing little to change the underlying economics facing publicans, some of whom note that quieter days between matches and extra costs like additional screens ate into the gains. On extended late-night licensing specifically, this side would point to legitimate concerns about the burden on policing, public order and local residents that come with round-the-clock trading, even for a well-supported national team's run in the competition.