Court of appeal clears way for Gatwick’s second runway
Developing story first seen 4 hours ago
Gatwick airport's second runway scheme has now been joined by confirmation that a separate expansion battle, over Luton airport, has also concluded, after the supreme court dismissed Luton Rising's final appeal against a high court ruling upholding transport secretary Heidi Alexander's approval of its growth plans. At Gatwick, the court of appeal on Tuesday rejected campaigners' bid to challenge an earlier high court ruling, clearing the way for the West Sussex airport to begin work on its £2.2bn second runway project after an eight-year planning and legal process. Together, the rulings mark a significant win for the government's aviation growth agenda, even as they draw renewed criticism from environmental and community groups.
Gatwick's plans involve repositioning its existing emergency runway for routine use by short-haul passenger aircraft, with the new runway expected to be operational as early as 2030, adding about 100,000 flights and 13 million passengers a year. Luton airport's expansion, meanwhile, will raise its annual capacity from 19 million to 32 million passengers by the mid-2040s, with its owner citing up to 11,000 new jobs and an extra £1.5bn in annual economic activity, alongside pledged controls on noise, carbon and air quality. The Department for Transport is also investing more than £219m in green fuel production, while campaigners, including Gatwick Area Conservation Campaign chair Peter Barclay, warned the decisions will worsen aviation's climate, noise and congestion impacts.
- Gatwick's £2.2bn second runway cleared after court of appeal rejects challenge
- Luton airport's expansion also cleared following failed supreme court appeal
- Gatwick runway targeted for 2030; Luton to reach 32m passengers by mid-2040s
New here? Start with this
Gatwick, near London, is Britain's second busiest airport. For years it has wanted a second runway to handle more flights, but the plan needed government approval and then survived legal challenges from campaigners before it could go ahead.
The scheme doesn't involve building a brand new runway from scratch. Instead, an existing emergency runway, currently only used as a backup, will be adjusted slightly so it can be used regularly by short-haul passenger planes. The £2.2bn project was approved by the transport secretary last September, and supporters say it will allow around 100,000 extra flights and 13 million more passengers a year, with opening pencilled in for as early as 2030.
The expansion has been contested by environmental and local community groups, who worry about the impact on noise, air pollution, congestion and climate emissions, arguing these effects were not properly assessed. The government, meanwhile, sees it as part of a wider push to grow UK aviation capacity, alongside investment in green aviation fuel intended to offset some of the extra emissions. A similar expansion at Luton airport has also recently overcome its own legal hurdles.
Both sides, in good faith
The strongest fair case each way — we don't pick a winner.
The case for
Supporters argue that expanding Gatwick meets clear, growing demand for air travel while making efficient use of an existing runway rather than building on new land, delivering economic benefits including jobs, connectivity and £2.2bn of investment with relatively modest additional infrastructure. They point to the accompanying £219m commitment to green fuel production as evidence that growth and decarbonisation can be pursued together, and see the eight-year legal process, culminating in courts twice upholding the decision, as proof the scheme has been rigorously and fairly scrutinised. For them, this represents sensible, democratically sanctioned national infrastructure policy that boosts Britain's global connectivity and economic competitiveness.
The case against
Campaigners contend that adding 100,000 flights a year runs directly counter to the UK's climate commitments, and that reliance on green fuel investment understates the scale of emissions a near-25% capacity increase will bring, arguing the climate assessment underpinning approval was inadequate. They also raise the concrete, immediate costs to residents near the airport: increased noise, air pollution and road congestion from millions more passengers, borne by local communities while broader benefits are dispersed nationally. For them, the case reflects a deeper concern that growth-focused aviation policy is being pushed through despite unresolved environmental and quality-of-life impacts, using legal and regulatory processes that favour large infrastructure projects over local and ecological objections.
More coverage
Art Business Celebrity Culture Elections Entertainment Fashion Politics Software Technology Travel UK World
Read the full article at the source →
Originally published by The Guardian as “Gatwick airport to open second runway after legal challenge fails”.