PIF-led consortium completes $55bn take-private of Electronic Arts
Developed over time first seen 2 months ago
Electronic Arts has officially completed its move to private ownership, with the $55 billion all-cash takeover by Saudi Arabia's Public Investment Fund (PIF), Jared Kushner's Affinity Partners and Silver Lake closing at the end of trading on 4 August 2026. The deal followed EA's confirmation via a US Securities and Exchange Commission filing that all required regulatory approvals had been secured, including European Commission clearance on 23 July, marking one of the largest private equity buyouts in tech and gaming history and handing a Saudi state-backed fund substantial influence over a major games publisher.
Silver Lake, a New York- and Menlo Park-based tech investor founded in 1999, manages around $102 billion in assets, while Affinity Partners, founded by Kushner in 2021 and largely funded by the PIF, holds $5.4 billion; the PIF itself, chaired by Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, oversees roughly $900 billion and already holds stakes in publishers including Activision Blizzard, Capcom, Nintendo and Take-Two. EA has insisted it will retain creative control and that its "values and commitment to players" remain unchanged, with chief executive Andrew Wilson – who earned $38 million last year – reiterating this pledge, though critics have labelled the acquisition a form of "sportswashing" given the PIF's human rights record, and some EA staff have voiced anger over the takeover.
- EA's $55bn take-private by PIF-led consortium completed on 4 August 2026
- Saudi Arabia's PIF, Affinity Partners and Silver Lake now own EA
- Critics call it "sportswashing"; some EA staff express anger
New here? Start with this
Saudi Arabia's Public Investment Fund is a state-run sovereign wealth fund controlled ultimately by Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, managing hundreds of billions of pounds in assets on behalf of the Saudi state. Electronic Arts, best known for franchises such as FIFA-style football games, The Sims and Battlefield, is one of the world's biggest video game publishers. The deal to take EA private, agreed earlier this year, involved the PIF joining forces with the US private equity firm Silver Lake and Affinity Partners, an investment firm run by Jared Kushner, son-in-law of former US President Donald Trump.
Sovereign wealth funds like the PIF invest state money in businesses abroad, and the PIF has spent years building stakes in gaming companies including Nintendo, Capcom and Activision Blizzard, alongside full ownership of the studio SNK. This EA deal is far larger than those previous investments, giving the fund a controlling role in one of the industry's biggest publishers rather than just a minority shareholding. Because EA was previously a publicly listed company, its shares are now removed from the stock market and the business answers instead to its new private owners.
The takeover matters because it raises questions about how much influence a foreign government can have over a major entertainment company that reaches hundreds of millions of players worldwide, and because Saudi Arabia's human rights record has led critics to argue that such investments are intended to improve the kingdom's international image, a practice often referred to as "sportswashing". EA has said it expects to keep making creative decisions independently, but the scale of the deal, and the identities of the investors involved, have made it a focal point in wider debates about foreign state investment in Western media and technology firms.
Both sides, in good faith
The strongest fair case each way — we don't pick a winner.
The case for
The strongest case for permitting this transaction emphasises established principles of free market investment and cross-border capital flow. Shareholders voted for the deal, multiple regulatory bodies across two continents approved it, and blocking investment on the basis of nationality sets a problematic precedent for selective application of rules. EA's management has committed to preserving creative autonomy, concerns about content control remain speculative rather than demonstrated, and engagement through commerce may ultimately prove more constructive than adversarial isolation.
The case against
The strongest case for restricting this transaction emphasises that entertainment is not merely a commodity but a cultural medium shaping values—particularly for younger audiences—and warrants different scrutiny than standard financial investments. Saudi Arabia's documented concerns regarding women's rights, LGBTQ+ inclusion and press freedom are significant, and the history of "sportswashing" demonstrates how entertainment investment can rehabilitate public image whilst underlying practices persist unchanged. Creative control assurances are historically fragile when state shareholders have strategic interests in a company's output, and concentrating cultural influence in sovereign wealth funds raises legitimate questions about whose values shape entertainment consumed globally.
More coverage
- GamesRadar+ — EA and games like The Sims, Dragon Age, and Battlefield are now officially owned by Saudi Arabia and private equity as $55 billion deal closes
- PC Gamer — The deal is done: Electronic Arts is now officially owned by Saudi Arabia
- Rock Paper Shotgun — EA have gone private, as Saudi Arabia and Jared Kushner's investment groups complete their $55 billion acquisition
Read the full article at the source →
Originally published by Polygon as “EA’s deal to go private under Saudi Arabia is officially complete”.