US judge halts federal plan to curb postal voting
Developing story first seen 3 hours ago
A US federal judge has blocked part of President Donald Trump's executive order that sought to tighten mail-in voting rules ahead of the 2026 midterm elections. US District Judge Indira Talwani, sitting in Massachusetts, granted a preliminary injunction on Tuesday preventing the US Postal Service (USPS) from implementing the disputed provision, dealing a setback to the administration's efforts to overhaul postal voting procedures before polling day.
The contested policy, set out in a proposed rule, would have allowed the USPS to withhold mailing ballots to any state that declined to share its absentee voter list with the federal government. Postmaster General David Steiner had confirmed this approach when questioned by a Senate Democrat during a hearing on the proposal. The injunction temporarily halts that element of the plan while legal challenges continue, though other parts of Trump's wider order on mail-in voting remain unaffected for now.
- Judge blocks USPS rule tied to Trump's mail-in voting order.
- Rule would've let USPS withhold ballots from non-compliant states.
- Injunction is temporary; legal fight over the order continues.
New here? Start with this
The plan to change mail-in voting comes from an executive order signed by President Donald Trump, aimed at tightening the rules around postal ballots ahead of the 2026 midterm elections, when all seats in the House of Representatives and a third of the Senate are up for grabs. One strand of that order would have let the US Postal Service refuse to deliver ballots to states that would not hand over their lists of absentee voters to the federal government. Supporters of the order say tighter checks are needed to safeguard election integrity, while critics argue it risks disenfranchising voters who rely on postal ballots, a debate that has run through American politics since the 2020 election.
The case has now moved into the courts, where opponents have challenged the order's legality. US District Judge Indira Talwani, based in Massachusetts, is overseeing one such challenge, and the Postmaster General, David Steiner, who runs the Postal Service, has been questioned by lawmakers about how the policy would work in practice.
This matters because postal voting is a significant part of how millions of Americans cast their ballots, particularly those who cannot vote in person, so any change to the rules could affect turnout and access ahead of a major nationwide election.
Both sides, in good faith
The strongest fair case each way — we don't pick a winner.
The case for
Supporters of the administration's approach argue that a state's willingness to share its absentee voter list is a reasonable precondition for federal cooperation in distributing ballots, since verifying who is eligible to vote by post helps guard against duplicate, fraudulent or outdated registrations being used to cast ballots. They see this as a legitimate exercise of federal oversight over a national postal system, intended to strengthen public confidence in mail-in voting ahead of a closely watched election. From this perspective, states that refuse to share basic voter data are impeding reasonable transparency measures that most voters would consider uncontroversial safeguards.
The case against
Opponents of the policy argue that withholding ballot delivery from voters in non-compliant states amounts to punishing ordinary citizens for a dispute between state and federal officials, risking disenfranchisement of eligible voters through no fault of their own. They see the measure as federal overreach into an area the Constitution largely reserves to the states, and worry that compelling states to hand over sensitive voter data, especially so close to an election, raises privacy and security concerns without clear evidence that it would meaningfully reduce fraud. For them, the judge's injunction reflects a reasonable caution against disrupting settled voting procedures on the eve of a contested campaign.
More coverage
Read the full article at the source →
Originally published by Fox News as “Federal judge blocks Trump administration from restricting mail-in ballots ahead of midterms”.