← Back to the feed

SpaceX intends to invest up to $100 billion in massive Louisiana spaceport

Developed over time first seen 2 months ago

Ars Technica ·

SpaceX will invest up to $100 billion to build "Starbase Louisiana," a vast new Starship factory and launch site on the Gulf coast, Louisiana Governor Jeff Landry confirmed. The project, unveiled by SpaceX president Gwynne Shotwell in the small town of Abbeville, aims to replicate and scale up the company's existing Starbase Texas facility, giving SpaceX the extra launch capacity it needs to pursue plans for thousands of annual Starship flights, including deployment of a large orbital data-centre satellite constellation.

The site sits on roughly 125,000 acres of coastal wetland known as Pecan Island, dwarfing the 350-acre Texas facility, and became available through a legal settlement over pollution and coastal erosion lawsuits against ExxonMobil; SpaceX first showed interest around six months ago. Construction of the first launch facilities is due to begin in 2027, with an initial launch targeted for 2029. The facility is planned as self-sufficient, including propellant production, power generation, deep-water shipping and an airport, while SpaceX has pledged to use only a small portion of the land, support coastal erosion mitigation, and create jobs in the region. The location also offers easier access to polar orbits and barge transport to SpaceX's existing Texas Starfactory.

  • SpaceX to spend up to $100bn on new Louisiana "Starbase" spaceport
  • Site covers 125,000 acres, far larger than Starbase Texas
  • Construction starts 2027, first launch targeted for 2029

New here? Start with this

SpaceX has built a growing business launching rockets from a handful of sites, including a private facility called Starbase in southern Texas. Its Starship rocket, the biggest launch vehicle the company has developed, is central to founder Elon Musk's plans for frequent, large-scale space missions, but the Texas site is small and limits how many launch towers can be built there.

Louisiana's Governor, Jeff Landry, has been courting the company as part of efforts to bring major investment and jobs to the state. The proposed new site sits on a large stretch of land along the Gulf coast that recently became available following a legal settlement involving ExxonMobil over pollution and coastal damage claims, an area that also includes sensitive wetlands.

The project matters because of its scale, both in money and land, and because it reflects SpaceX's ambitions to dramatically increase how often it can launch rockets, including for new satellite systems it plans to build. Any development of this size also raises practical questions about construction timelines, environmental impact and the effect on local communities along the coast.

Both sides, in good faith

The strongest fair case each way — we don't pick a winner.

The case for

Supporters see this as a landmark opportunity for economic renewal in a state still recovering from industrial decline and coastal environmental damage, arguing that a $100 billion investment will bring thousands of skilled jobs, new infrastructure and long-term tax revenue to a historically underserved region. They point to the site's vast size and isolation as a genuine safety and operational advantage, allowing SpaceX to pursue ambitious launch cadences without competing for range access, while trusting the company's stated commitment to minimise its footprint and support wetland restoration as a net environmental improvement over the area's industrial past. For advocates of American spaceflight leadership, the project also represents a meaningful step towards reducing costs and expanding capability for both commercial and national space ambitions.

The case against

Sceptics, including some environmental advocates and coastal residents, worry that placing a vast industrial rocket facility on ecologically sensitive Gulf wetlands risks compounding erosion and habitat loss in a region already battered by decades of industrial harm, regardless of mitigation pledges, and note the irony of building on land freed up by a pollution settlement. They also raise concerns about the wisdom of concentrating such enormous public attention and infrastructure spending around a single private company's ambitions, questioning whether local communities will see promised benefits or instead face disruption, noise, launch-related risks and diminished say over land historically tied to fishing and conservation. Others caution that long timelines and the scale of the commitment warrant closer scrutiny of the incentives and regulatory arrangements involved before treating the project as an unambiguous win.

More coverage

Space Technology

Read the full article at the source →