US disrupts Chinese cyber espionage targeting Senate and agencies

← Back to the feed

US disrupts Chinese cyber espionage targeting Senate and agencies

Developing story first seen 3 hours ago

Daily Mail · 3 hours ago

The US Justice Department says it has disrupted a Chinese state-sponsored cyber espionage operation by seizing two internet domains used to compromise and conceal access to sensitive networks. The action matters because the alleged campaign reportedly reached major US government bodies and critical infrastructure, illustrating the continuing risk posed by long-running state-backed cyber activity.

Prosecutors said the group, identified as QTFY, had operated since at least 2018 and served clients including China’s Ministry of State Security and the People’s Liberation Army. Its QScan platform allegedly infected internet-connected devices, while QTRouter routed activity through them to mask its origin; reported victims included the US Senate, Federal Reserve, NASA, several federal health and energy agencies, and organisations in the US and South Korea.

  • US seizes domains linked to alleged Chinese hacking operation.
  • Targets reportedly included Senate, NASA and Federal Reserve networks.
  • Malware allegedly used infected devices to conceal attackers’ origins.

New here? Start with this

Cyber espionage is the use of digital tools to obtain information from another country’s government, businesses or public bodies without permission. States may use specialist groups to seek intelligence, monitor targets or gain access to systems that could be useful in a future crisis.

US authorities say the activity involved companies and people they link to China’s Ministry of State Security, the country’s civilian intelligence agency, and the People’s Liberation Army, China’s military. China has previously rejected similar US allegations of state-backed hacking.

The reported targets include government institutions, health and energy bodies, and critical infrastructure, meaning services and systems important to everyday life and national security. Such operations can be hard to trace because attackers may use compromised internet-connected devices to hide where their activity began.

Both sides, in good faith

The strongest fair case each way — we don't pick a winner.

The case for

Supporters argue that seizing infrastructure allegedly used for state-backed espionage is a proportionate defensive step to protect democratic institutions, public agencies and critical services. If the reported evidence is sound, disrupting domains that help conceal intrusions can limit immediate harm without escalating to broader punitive measures. They see this as part of a necessary effort to uphold national security, deter persistent cyber operations and protect sensitive public data.

The case against

Sceptics argue that public attribution and domain seizures should be subject to especially rigorous evidential and legal scrutiny, because cyber activity is technically complex and accusations between major powers can intensify diplomatic tensions. China may regard the claims as politically motivated or insufficiently substantiated, while others may worry about states asserting wide authority over internet infrastructure. From this perspective, long-term security is better served by transparent evidence, clear international rules and channels that reduce the risk of reciprocal escalation.

More coverage

Americas Cybersecurity Government Politics Technology World

Read the full article at the source →

Originally published by Daily Mail as “Chilling plot reveals Chinese ‘cyber spies’ hacked top Trump government agencies and the Senate”.