Key witness in Meta trial says terms of settlement insufficient to halt apps’ harms to teenagers
A former Facebook safety engineer and key witness in the US case against Meta has said the company’s settlement with dozens of states does not adequately address the risks its platforms pose to teenagers. Arturo Béjar argues that limiting screen time is insufficient if Facebook and Instagram’s underlying algorithms continue to promote addictive or harmful experiences, and says the agreement should not be treated as proof that the products are safe.
The settlement requires Meta to introduce stricter teen time limits, default non-algorithmic feeds, stronger parental controls, and restrictions on features such as likes and beauty filters, alongside night and school modes. States alleged Meta designed addictive products linked to problems including depression, disordered eating and suicide; Meta denied wrongdoing, said it already has extensive protections, and maintained that social media can benefit teenagers.
- Béjar says Meta’s settlement fails to tackle harmful algorithmic design.
- The agreement adds teen limits, defaults and parental controls.
- Meta denies wrongdoing and cites existing safety protections.
Americas Art Business Celebrity Culture Entertainment Government Politics World