Reagan-era official warns ‘red-green alliance’ has shared goal of ‘destroying’ America
Frank Gaffney, a former Reagan administration defence official, has warned of what he describes as a “red-green alliance” between radical Islamist groups and far-left socialists. He argues that these movements have differing long-term aims but share opposition to the US constitutional system; the article presents this as a national-security concern and as part of a wider political debate.
Gaffney made the remarks to Fox News Digital while discussing the Democratic Socialists of America and Islamist movements. The claims were also raised at a Senate Judiciary subcommittee hearing on alleged Muslim Brotherhood networks, where Senator Ted Cruz and Centre for Security Policy analyst Kyle Shideler described a similar alleged partnership; the article does not provide independent evidence establishing the broad claims.
- Gaffney alleges Islamist and far-left groups share anti-American objectives.
- Similar claims featured in a recent Senate subcommittee hearing.
- The article presents allegations, not independently verified conclusions.
New here? Start with this
Frank Gaffney is a former US defence official who now leads the Centre for Security Policy, a think tank. The Democratic Socialists of America is a US political organisation that supports democratic socialism, while Islamist movements seek a greater role for Islamic principles in politics; they are varied, and do not all share the same aims.
The phrase “red-green alliance” is used by some commentators for an alleged alignment between parts of the political left and Islamist groups. Gaffney and others have presented this as a national-security concern, but the broad claim of a shared effort against the US constitutional system is disputed and has not been independently established in the account.
Both sides, in good faith
The strongest fair case each way — we don't pick a winner.
The case for
Those who share Gaffney’s concern argue that movements with very different ideologies can still cooperate tactically when they oppose the same institutions. They say officials should examine specific organisations, networks and conduct for possible threats to constitutional government, and that scrutiny is prudent even before every allegation is conclusively established.
The case against
Sceptics argue that describing diverse Islamist groups and left-wing socialists as a unified alliance risks turning an unsubstantiated generalisation into a security narrative. Without independent evidence of coordination or a shared plan to undermine the US constitutional system, they say, such claims can unfairly cast legitimate political activity and Muslim communities as threats.