Video games news, releases, esports and culture — all the biggest gaming stories in one place.
Should you kill the soldiers at the mill in The Blood of Dawnwalker?
The article is a gameplay guide for a decision involving soldiers at a mill in The Blood of Dawnwalker. It explains the consequences of choosing whether to kill them, helping players make an informed choice based on their preferred approach to the quest.
The decision is presented as a role-playing choice rather than a single mandatory outcome. Players are encouraged to consider the immediate risks, potential rewards and longer-term effects on the story before acting.
In short
- The guide explains a mill-side choice involving soldiers.
- Consider quest consequences before deciding.
- The choice supports different role-playing approaches.
Steelman: both sides, in good faith
The strongest fair case each way — we don't pick a winner.
The case for
Killing the soldiers may suit players who see them as an immediate threat or want to pursue a more forceful approach to the quest. If it brings useful rewards or changes later events in a way that fits their character, that can make the choice feel meaningful.
The case against
Sparing the soldiers may suit players who want to avoid unnecessary deaths or preserve options for later in the story. If killing them creates added risks or closes off future possibilities, restraint may better serve both the quest and the character they are role-playing.
Explained simply
The Blood of Dawnwalker is a role-playing game in which players guide a character through quests and make choices that can affect how events unfold. Its story includes situations where the player must decide how to deal with other characters.
At the mill, the player encounters soldiers and can choose whether to kill them. The choice may carry immediate risks or rewards and could affect later events, so players may weigh it against the kind of character and approach they want to pursue.