Kamala Harris says she ‘supports’ Dems who don’t want her on campaign trail: ‘Whatever they need to do to win’

Fox News ·

Kamala Harris responded on air to reports that several Democratic candidates in Republican-leaning states want her to stay away from their 2026 midterm campaigns, saying she "supports" them doing "whatever they need to do to win." The exchange, prompted by an MS NOW interviewer citing a Politico report, highlights ongoing tension within the Democratic Party over Harris's continued visibility, with some candidates worried her unpopularity in conservative areas could hurt their own election chances.

According to Politico's reporting, Iowa's two leading Democratic candidates, Alaska's Democratic Senate nominee, a Wisconsin swing-district candidate and a Kansas Senate hopeful have all indicated they would prefer Harris keep her distance. Wisconsin candidate Rebecca Cooke noted she outpolled Harris by 9,000 votes in her district in 2024 and said she does not need campaign help. Harris also said her focus is on winning the 2026 midterms rather than a potential 2028 presidential run, while Republican commentators seized on the episode as evidence of Democratic disarray and Harris's declining standing within her own party.

In short

  • Harris says she backs Democrats who don't want her campaigning for them.
  • Red-state Democratic candidates reportedly fear her unpopularity could hurt them.
  • Harris says she's focused on 2026 midterms, not a 2028 run.

Steelman: both sides, in good faith

The strongest fair case each way — we don't pick a winner.

The case for

Candidates in Republican-leaning states have reason to tailor their campaigns to local voters: if Harris’s presence is unpopular there, keeping her away could help them make their own case and improve Democrats’ chances of winning. Their preference need not imply personal hostility; it may reflect a practical judgement about what support will help in their districts. Harris’s response respects their autonomy and keeps the focus on the shared goal of winning.

The case against

Keeping a prominent party figure away may weaken Democrats’ ability to present a united campaign and mobilise voters who value her support. Her appearances could bring attention, resources and enthusiasm that benefit candidates beyond voters already inclined to support her, while distancing themselves from her risks reinforcing the impression of party disunity. Candidates may therefore gain more by welcoming her while making their own local case.

Explained simply

Kamala Harris was the Democratic Party's 2024 presidential candidate, losing to Donald Trump, and previously served as Vice President under Joe Biden. She remains a prominent national figure in the party, and speculation has continued about whether she might run for office again, including a possible 2028 presidential bid.

The 2026 midterm elections will decide control of Congress, with many competitive seats in states that lean Republican. Some Democratic candidates in these areas have reportedly signalled they would rather campaign without Harris's involvement, reflecting broader debate within the party about which figures help or hinder candidates in more conservative territory.

This matters because it touches on wider questions about the Democratic Party's direction and messaging heading into a key election, as well as how Harris's political future and public image are evolving after her 2024 defeat.

Elections Government Politics World

Read the full article at the source →

Log in to join the discussion