← Back to the feed

Nvidia Extends DLSS 5 to Older GPUs as Performance Concerns Emerge

Developed over time first seen 2 months ago

·

Nvidia has confirmed to The Verge that its new DLSS 5 AI rendering technology will officially extend to older RTX 40-series graphics cards, reversing an earlier plan to limit the feature to its newest RTX 50-series GPUs at launch. The reversal followed modders successfully porting a leaked version of DLSS 5 to run on a wide range of Nvidia hardware, effectively undermining the company's original restriction before it had even shipped. The episode highlights the tension between Nvidia's tightly controlled rollout strategy and the reality of leaks, while leaving open questions about performance and how much creative control the technology hands to developers versus players.

In the end, Nvidia said its immediate focus remained tuning performance on RTX 50-series cards, with model updates expected later in autumn, before turning attention to the 40-series; older RTX 30- and 20-series cards, which modders also got running albeit with poor framerates and crashes, were not given an official timeline. Nvidia confirmed DLSS 5 would remain a simple on/off toggle for gamers, with granular controls such as Structure Intensity, Tone Intensity and masking reserved for developers, though studios could still expose some settings themselves. The company declined to reconfirm which of the 16 originally announced titles, including Assassin's Creed Shadows, Hogwarts Legacy, Starfield and Resident Evil Requiem, would still receive the feature, saying only that "more games are on the way."

  • Nvidia will officially bring DLSS 5 to RTX 40-series GPUs, not just RTX 50-series.
  • Move follows modders leaking and porting DLSS 5 to older, unsupported cards.
  • Nvidia declined to reconfirm which of 16 announced games will get DLSS 5.

New here? Start with this

Nvidia's DLSS is technology built into its graphics cards that uses artificial intelligence to boost game performance, generating extra frames or sharper detail rather than having the card render everything from scratch. DLSS 5 is the newest version, and Nvidia had originally planned to keep it exclusive to its latest RTX 50-series cards when it launches, meaning owners of older cards would have missed out on the improvements.

That plan changed after independent modders got hold of a leaked version of DLSS 5 and managed to make it work on a much wider range of Nvidia graphics cards than officially supported, effectively showing the restriction could be bypassed anyway. DLSS 5 has also drawn debate over how well it performs and how much control it gives developers, as opposed to players, over how the technology behaves in a given game.

This matters because graphics cards are expensive and many gamers hold onto older models for years, so decisions about which cards get access to new features affect a large number of people. The story is also part of a wider discussion about how much say individual players should have over AI-driven visual settings in games, compared with the developers who build them.

Both sides, in good faith

The strongest fair case each way — we don't pick a winner.

The case for

Extending DLSS 5 to older RTX 40-series cards, and eventually further back, is the right call because gamers who paid substantial sums for still-capable hardware deserve access to software improvements Nvidia is capable of delivering, not artificial segmentation designed to nudge upgrades. The fact that modders got a leaked build running across a wide range of cards demonstrates the restriction was a business choice rather than a technical necessity, and consumer advocates would argue that giving players only a simple on/off toggle, while reserving granular controls for developers, further shortchanges enthusiasts who understand their own hardware and preferences better than a one-size-fits-all default. Openness, choice, and rewarding loyal customers should take priority over tightly managed rollouts.

The case against

Nvidia's staged, developer-curated approach reflects a defensible engineering and quality-control philosophy: rolling out a complex AI rendering system methodically, starting with the newest architecture it understands best, reduces the risk of the poor framerates and crashes seen when modders forced DLSS 5 onto unsupported 30- and 20-series cards. Limiting granular settings like model selection and masking to developers, rather than end users, can be seen as protecting the intended visual and performance experience of each game, since misconfigured settings in inexperienced hands could produce worse outcomes and unfair comparisons across titles. A company investing heavily in new technology has legitimate reason to prioritise stability and a curated experience over maximal, unmanaged access from day one.

Coverage

AI Americas Art Basketball Culture Entertainment Gaming Music Software Technology World

Read the full article at the source →