Chat Pile’s third album brightens sound but strains for new identity

← Back to the feed

Chat Pile’s third album brightens sound but strains for new identity

Developed over time first seen 9 hours ago

The Guardian · 9 hours ago

The Guardian's review of Chat Pile's third album, Who Loves the Sun, concludes that the Oklahoma sludge-metal band has swapped their trademark abrasive sound for a brighter, more melodic alt-rock direction. While this shift makes their lyrical preoccupations more accessible, the reviewer feels the record falls short of the striking originality that defined the group's earlier work, leaving them caught between their acclaimed 2022 debut and a fully realised new identity.

Where God's Country (2022) and Cool World (2024) relied on oily, grunting sludge riffs and Raygun Busch's throat-shredding vocals, Who Loves the Sun embraces jangly, XTC-influenced guitars, more dynamic song structures and hookier singing, while Busch's lyrics broaden from American violence to the wider theme of desensitisation. Tracks such as Intruder, the trip-hoppy Same Rules and the post-rock-leaning Shrine show a pleasing stylistic range, but the reviewer argues the band bypassed more distinctive avenues hinted at by their film score Tenkiller and the singer-songwriter tracks on In the Earth Again, leaving the album a straightforward softening rather than a bold reinvention.

  • Guardian reviews Chat Pile's third album, Who Loves the Sun
  • Band trades sludge-metal abrasiveness for brighter alt-rock sound
  • Reviewer says record lacks the distinctiveness of earlier releases

New here? Start with this

Chat Pile are a four-piece band from Oklahoma known for sludge metal, a heavy, slow, distorted style of rock, built around thick guitar riffs and vocalist Raygun Busch's harsh, shouted delivery. Their 2022 debut, God's Country, and 2024 follow-up, Cool World, won them a strong reputation, with lyrics often tackling bleak subjects like violence in America.

Their new record, Who Loves the Sun, marks a deliberate change of direction: instead of grinding sludge, it leans into brighter, more melodic alternative rock, with jangly guitars reminiscent of the band XTC and more conventional song structures. Busch's lyrics have also widened in scope, moving from specific depictions of violence to broader ideas about desensitisation, or becoming numb to disturbing things.

This matters because it marks a significant artistic pivot for a band that built its name on abrasiveness and originality, and raises the question of whether a softer, more accessible sound suits them, or whether it risks losing what made them distinctive in the first place.

Both sides, in good faith

The strongest fair case each way — we don't pick a winner.

The case for

Admirers of the new direction would argue that Chat Pile deserve credit for resisting the trap of repeating a successful formula, and that broadening from grunting sludge into jangly, dynamic songwriting shows genuine artistic growth rather than a loss of nerve. They would point out that widening the lyrical lens from specifically American violence to the universal theme of desensitisation makes the band's social commentary more resonant and harder to dismiss as a regional curiosity. For these listeners, a band that can convincingly inhabit trip-hop, post-rock and XTC-inflected pop within one record is demonstrating range and maturity, not timidity, and should be judged on the strength of the songs themselves rather than measured against the shock value of their debut.

The case against

Critics of the shift would counter that Chat Pile's identity was built precisely on the unrelenting abrasiveness and throat-shredding intensity that made God's Country and Cool World feel dangerous and singular, and that softening the sound risks trading a distinctive voice for a more generic, radio-friendly alt-rock palette. They would note that the band's own side-projects, such as the Tenkiller score and In the Earth Again, hint at bolder avant-garde instincts than Who Loves the Sun actually delivers, suggesting the album is a commercially cautious compromise rather than a fully committed reinvention. From this perspective, an established band's responsibility to its audience is to either deepen what made it exceptional or take a genuinely bold new risk, and a record caught between the two satisfies neither ambition.

More coverage

Art Business Culture Entertainment Geopolitics Markets Music Politics

Read the full article at the source →

Originally published by The Guardian as “Chat Pile: Who Loves the Sun review – sludge metallers resurface with a slightly limiting alt-rock rebrand”.