Zach Cregger’s quirky Resident Evil film proves skeptics wrong with series-best opening weekend

Full account

Director Zach Cregger's unconventional approach to the Resident Evil franchise has delivered a significant commercial triumph, achieving the strongest opening weekend in the series' history. The film accumulated $108.3 million globally during its inaugural weekend, comprising $60 million domestically within the United States and $48.3 million from international territories. This performance surpasses Cregger's previous horror venture Weapons, which earned $70 million, and substantially outpaces all preceding Resident Evil films. The release represents the second-highest opening for a horror title this year, trailing only the phenomenon of Backrooms, which garnered $118 million. Notably, the film has already eclipsed the total lifetime earnings of the original 2002 Resident Evil picture, which accumulated $102.9 million across its entire theatrical run.

Cregger's deliberate decision to eschew the franchise's established iconography forms the creative cornerstone of the venture. Rather than centring the narrative around Leon S. Kennedy or the Redfield family—beloved characters from the source material—the director crafted a story centred on Bryan, an ordinary medical courier portrayed by Austin Abrams who becomes catastrophically unprepared for the calamities unfolding around him. Abrams' deliberate refusal to undergo physical conditioning for the role underscores Cregger's thematic intent: positioning an unremarkable, physically unimposing protagonist against escalating peril creates both comedic and genuinely unsettling effects. Cregger articulated this philosophy in describing his preference for witnessing an out-of-shape, gun-inexperienced protagonist navigating a series of escalating threats, suggesting that the unexpected combination of absurd humour and authentic horror generates unpredictability.

The critical and audience response has validated Cregger's gambit. The film achieved a 95 per cent rating from professional critics and 91 per cent from audiences on Rotten Tomatoes, suggesting broad approval across demographic groups. These approval metrics accompany the commercial success, positioning the film as a rare instance where unconventional creative vision produces both critical credibility and financial returns. Sources have indicated that a sequel appears probable, though Cregger has signalled reluctance towards helming subsequent instalments in the series.

Beyond its immediate success, the film's reception offers broader implications for the video game adaptation industry. The critical discourse has positioned Bryan's buffoonish characterisation as a conduit for audience identification—a contrasting device that elevates the viewing experience by providing a relatable everyman figure navigating impossible circumstances. This narrative strategy proves particularly compelling when juxtaposed against traditional game-adaptation approaches that privilege heroic protagonists. The concurrent September 2026 release of Paramount Plus's Golden Axe series, which similarly introduces an incompetent character (Hampton Squib, played by Danny Pudi) alongside established warrior archetypes, suggests this methodology may represent emerging industry best practice for video game intellectual property.

• www.eurogamer.net
• www.polygon.com