← Back to the feed

Russian media claims a second victim has died from ‘plague outbreak’ at infection zone hospital as Kremlin scrambles to cover up details

Developed over time first seen 13 hours ago

Daily Mail ·

Russian media have reported that a second person has died after contracting plague in Russia’s Irkutsk region, but the claim has not been confirmed by health authorities. The reports follow the death of laboratory technician Darya Shipilova, 28, and have raised concern amid conflicting accounts of the cause and extent of the illness.

Shipilova died on 2 October after reportedly being exposed to pneumonic plague at the Irkutsk Anti-Plague Institute, where she is said to have broken a tube containing live bacteria. Russia’s public health agency says she died of unspecified pneumonia and describes the regional situation as stable; reports also say several hospitals are quarantined and hundreds of staff and patients cannot leave. Russian outlets have removed some coverage, while officials have urged the public to rely on the health agency’s statements.

  • Russian media claim a second death linked to plague in Irkutsk.
  • Officials say Shipilova died of unspecified pneumonia.
  • Reports describe hospital quarantines and deleted coverage.

New here? Start with this

A laboratory technician named Darya Shipilova died on 2 October after reportedly being exposed to pneumonic plague at the Irkutsk Anti-Plague Institute in Russia's Irkutsk region. Unconfirmed reports in Russian media have since suggested additional deaths from the illness.

Russia's public health agency has stated that Shipilova died of unspecified pneumonia and that the situation is stable, but media reports indicate that several hospitals have been quarantined with hundreds of staff and patients unable to leave. This contradiction between official statements and media reports has raised questions about what actually happened at the laboratory and the scope of any outbreak.

The incident raises concerns about safety protocols at Russian research facilities and the openness of official responses to potential public health emergencies. Some Russian media outlets have removed coverage of the situation, and officials have urged the public to rely on official health agency statements, which has created confusion about what is actually occurring.

Both sides, in good faith

The strongest fair case each way — we don't pick a winner.

The case for

Critics point to what they see as systematic downplaying: official characterisation of a confirmed plague-related death as 'unspecified pneumonia,' description of stability alongside extensive quarantines, and removal of media coverage. They argue the public deserves transparent acknowledgment of serious biological incidents rather than information management designed to minimise public concern.

The case against

Supporters of the official response argue that the health agency, with complete information media outlets lack, provides more reliable assessment than unconfirmed reports; categorising pneumonic plague as pneumonia is technically accurate and not misleading. They contend that quarantines are standard precaution in any biological incident and that directing communication through official channels prevents panic and misinformation.

More coverage

Europe Health Medicine World

Read the full article at the source →