Trump envoys Kushner and Witkoff to meet with Ukrainian officials in Miami as war with Russia reaches ‘dangerous stalemate’
US envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner are due to meet Ukrainian officials in Miami for two days, aiming to develop a unified peace proposal. The talks come as US Secretary of State Marco Rubio describes the war as a “dangerous stalemate” and Russia’s strike on buses in Kramatorsk kills 30 people.
Ukraine’s delegation is expected to include senior officials, while the US has invited security advisers from the UK, France and Germany, as well as NATO and EU representatives. Discussions are set to cover security guarantees and Ukraine’s post-war recovery; earlier rounds have made little progress, with Moscow maintaining its demands.
- US envoys and Ukrainian officials are meeting in Miami.
- The talks aim to shape a unified peace proposal.
- A Russian strike on buses in Kramatorsk killed 30.
New here? Start with this
Russia invaded Ukraine in February 2022, sparking a war that has killed many thousands and displaced millions. The conflict has had major global economic and security implications, drawing Western nations into supporting Ukraine.
The United States, through envoys Jared Kushner and Steve Witkoff, is seeking to broker peace. Ukraine's government is in negotiations with Russian representatives, as well as allies including Britain, France, Germany, NATO and the European Union.
Previous peace negotiations have made little progress, with Russia and Ukraine holding opposing positions on key issues such as territorial control and security guarantees. Resolving these disagreements is important because the war continues to cause severe human suffering and disruption to international stability.
Both sides, in good faith
The strongest fair case each way — we don't pick a winner.
The case for
The war has settled into a dangerous stalemate with unsustainable human costs, as evidenced by continued civilian casualties. Coordinated diplomatic engagement by the US and its major allies offers a meaningful opportunity to develop security guarantees and post-war recovery frameworks that might resolve the conflict without indefinite further bloodshed. Even an imperfect negotiated settlement could be preferable to prolonged warfare with no clear path to resolution.
The case against
Negotiating whilst Russia maintains military advantage and continues committing attacks on civilians risks legitimising territorial gains and rewarding aggression. Without prior restoration of Ukrainian military advantage or genuinely ironclad security guarantees enforced by credible mechanisms, a negotiated peace could leave Ukraine vulnerable to future Russian advances, potentially making such an agreement worse than continued military contest.