Fox News host issues blistering take on Trump’s decision to buy 300k tons of diesel from Russia: ‘They’re the bad guys’
Developing story first seen 3 hours ago
Fox News host Brian Kilmeade launched a scathing attack on President Donald Trump's decision to purchase Russian diesel, warning that closer cooperation with Vladimir Putin could prove disastrous for his presidency. During a heated on-air confrontation on Fox & Friends Weekend, Kilmeade clashed with co-host Rachel Campos-Duffy over Trump's increasingly fraught relationship with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, with Kilmeade defending Kyiv's military efforts and accusing Putin of orchestrating Ukraine's bloodshed. Kilmeade declared Putin "the modern Hitler of our generation" and insisted that working with Russia would be "the biggest mistake of his administration."
The controversy erupted after Trump temporarily eased US sanctions on Russian diesel amid global energy supply pressures stemming from Iran's actions, which sent fuel prices soaring ahead of next month's midterm elections. Zelensky condemned the arrangement as a "weak decision," warning it would funnel American money into Russia's war effort, whilst Trump subsequently suggested Ukraine might need new leadership. Campos-Duffy challenged Kilmeade's prioritisation of Ukrainian interests, demanding to know whether he was "for America or Ukraine," but Kilmeade rejected suggestions that Ukraine bore responsibility for the diplomatic impasse, pointing instead to broader Middle Eastern disruptions and Ukraine's technological innovations in drone warfare.
- Kilmeade attacked Trump's Russian diesel purchase, calling it potentially catastrophic for his presidency
- Co-hosts clashed on air over whether to prioritise energy security or allied support
- Trump eased sanctions on Russian fuel amid global energy pressures and upcoming elections
New here? Start with this
The story concerns President Trump's decision to purchase Russian diesel whilst temporarily easing US sanctions. This decision was made amid global energy pressures, particularly following Iranian actions that caused fuel prices to rise considerably ahead of midterm elections.
The purchase is controversial because it represents closer economic ties with Russia at a time when the US has been imposing sanctions over Russia's invasion of Ukraine. Ukraine's government views the move as potentially funding Russia's war effort, creating diplomatic tension between the Trump administration and Kyiv.
The controversy has revealed divisions within conservative media, with Fox News host Brian Kilmeade publicly opposing the decision. Ukrainian President Zelensky has condemned the arrangement, whilst tensions have deepened as Trump's team has suggested Ukraine may need different leadership.
Both sides, in good faith
The strongest fair case each way — we don't pick a winner.
The case for
A pragmatic approach to energy security during a genuine global supply crisis merits consideration; with fuel prices directly affecting American households before crucial elections, securing supply through targeted purchases represents realpolitik rather than moral endorsement. Selective engagement with Russia on specific commodities—distinct from broader military alignment—could create diplomatic channels, and complete isolation of adversaries may harden rather than moderate their behaviour.
The case against
Purchasing Russian diesel directly finances Putin's war effort against Ukraine, effectively using American money to fund bombardment of a democratic nation resisting invasion. Supporting Ukraine reflects fundamental American values of defending sovereignty against authoritarianism, and abandoning allies signals that American security commitments are unreliable. Whilst energy crises are temporary, the strategic costs—damaged credibility with allies and weakened deterrence—could harm American interests for years.