← Back to the feed

River in ‘world’s most beautiful village’ to be fenced off from tourists amid fears hordes of summer paddlers harming wildlife

Daily Mail ·

Bibury Parish Council has approved fences along parts of the River Coln to deter visitors from paddling and disturbing wildlife. Councillors say the measure is needed after residents reported litter and activity in the water that could harm the river’s animals and habitat.

The Cotswolds village has about 600 residents but can receive up to 20,000 visitors a day at peak times, drawn by its historic cottages and social media attention. Locals also describe traffic congestion, parking disputes and visitors entering private spaces; trial coach drop-off points have been introduced, though residents say some drivers still stop elsewhere.

  • Fences are planned along parts of Bibury’s River Coln.
  • Residents cite litter and risks to wildlife.
  • The village can see up to 20,000 visitors a day.

New here? Start with this

Bibury is a small village in the Cotswolds, in Gloucestershire, best known for its historic stone cottages and the River Coln. Its popularity with visitors has grown, helped by photographs shared online, and visitor numbers can greatly exceed the number of people who live there.

The river is part of a natural habitat, and people entering the water can disturb wildlife or damage the riverbed. Residents have also raised concerns about litter, traffic and visitors using private spaces, prompting local efforts to manage the pressures of tourism.

Both sides, in good faith

The strongest fair case each way — we don't pick a winner.

The case for

Supporters argue that fencing is a proportionate way to protect the River Coln’s wildlife and habitat from heavy visitor use, especially when residents report litter and disturbance in the water. They may also see it as a practical response to visitor numbers that can far exceed the village’s resident population, while other measures have not fully eased pressure on local roads and private spaces.

The case against

Critics may argue that fencing restricts public access to a river and treats all visitors alike, including those who behave responsibly. They could favour targeted enforcement, clearer guidance or better visitor facilities, which might protect wildlife while preserving people’s opportunity to enjoy the river and avoiding further limits on access to a shared natural place.

Environment Science World

Read the full article at the source →

Cookie-free view counts · Privacy choices

We count page views to improve this website, including before you choose optional analytics. This counter keeps only a daily total: no visitor IDs, page addresses or browsing histories. It uses no tracking cookies and sends no data to Google or Microsoft. Optional analytics add richer reports if you accept them.

Your choice is remembered using a preference cookie. Rejecting analytics, Do Not Track and Global Privacy Control also stop this counter. Ordinary server access logs are separate.