Bernie Taupin says no amount of money could make him and Elton John sell publushing rights
Bernie Taupin says he and Elton John remain unwilling to sell their joint music publishing rights, despite large sums offered to artists who have sold their catalogues. He argues that he has little use for the money and is wary that some sellers later regret the decision.
Taupin said he lives frugally and wants to leave the decision to their children, while acknowledging his view could change. Recent reported deals include Neil Young selling half his publishing rights for about $150 million, David Bowie’s estate selling rights for $250 million, and Bruce Springsteen’s reported $500 million catalogue deal. Taupin’s first album since 1987, *The Sea Has No Mercy*, is released today.
In short
- Taupin says no sum would persuade him to sell now.
- He and Elton John want to leave the decision to their children.
- Other artists have secured deals worth hundreds of millions.
Steelman: both sides, in good faith
The strongest fair case each way — we don't pick a winner.
The case for
Selling music publishing rights can turn uncertain future royalties into a substantial sum now, giving artists or their families financial security and flexibility. Such deals may also make sense for people who have little interest in managing rights or prefer to use the money during their lifetime, while artists can still value their work without retaining ownership.
The case against
Keeping publishing rights preserves control over how the music is used and allows its creators and heirs to benefit from royalties over time. For artists who do not need an immediate payout, holding on may better protect a lasting legacy and leave a consequential choice to their children, especially if a sale could later be regretted.