Director Rory Kennedy on ‘The Trial of Alec Baldwin’: “If This Was Tom Hanks or Julia Roberts, I Don’t Think This Would Have Gone to Trial”

The Hollywood Reporter ·

Rory Kennedy’s documentary The Trial of Alec Baldwin revisits the fatal 2021 shooting on the set of Rust and Baldwin’s prosecution. Kennedy says the film examines how Baldwin’s public image and online judgement may have affected perceptions of the case and the fairness of legal proceedings.

Kennedy says Baldwin initially resisted taking part, then agreed on condition that she retained full editorial control and that he received no payment. The film states that he had no editorial control and was not compensated, which Kennedy says was important given the sensitivity of Hutchins’s death and the risk that the documentary could be seen as an effort to rehabilitate Baldwin. His 2024 trial was dismissed with prejudice after the judge found that prosecutors had improperly withheld evidence from the defence.

In short

  • Rory Kennedy’s documentary revisits the Rust shooting and Alec Baldwin’s trial.
  • The film explores public image and perceptions of legal fairness.
  • Baldwin had no editorial control and received no payment.

Steelman: both sides, in good faith

The strongest fair case each way — we don't pick a winner.

The case for

Kennedy’s argument is that Baldwin’s fame and the intense public judgement surrounding the shooting may have shaped how the case was perceived and pursued. The dismissal after the judge found that prosecutors had withheld evidence from the defence gives reason to scrutinise whether the process was fair, while Baldwin’s lack of editorial control or payment may help address concerns that the film simply serves his interests.

The case against

A serious prosecution can be justified by the evidence and the circumstances of a fatal shooting, regardless of whether the accused is famous or likeable. The trial’s dismissal for prosecutorial misconduct does not by itself show that Baldwin was targeted because of his public image, and the claim that another actor would have been treated differently remains a counterfactual that the reported facts cannot establish.

Explained simply

Rust was a Western film being made in New Mexico in 2021 when cinematographer Halyna Hutchins was fatally shot with a gun used on set. Actor Alec Baldwin was holding the gun; he has said he did not know it contained a live round. The shooting led to investigations and criminal proceedings.

Baldwin was charged with involuntary manslaughter, a crime involving an unintended death caused by a serious failure to act with proper care. His 2024 trial was dismissed with prejudice after the judge found that prosecutors had withheld evidence from the defence; this meant the charge could not be brought again. The case drew wide public attention, raising questions about responsibility on film sets and how public opinion might affect perceptions of a trial.

Entertainment Film

Read the full article at the source →

Log in to join the discussion