Cornell Jane Doe refuses to remove one of the seven men she claims gang-raped her from lawsuit after he said allegation was wildly overblown

Daily Mail ·

A former Cornell student identified as Jane Doe is opposing Diego Sarabia’s motion to dismiss claims against him in her civil lawsuit alleging a gang rape at the Chi Phi fraternity house. Sarabia denies the allegations, and his lawyers argue that the complaint does not connect him to the alleged assaults sufficiently to support the claims.

Doe alleges the incident took place during the night of 19 to 20 October 2024 and involved seven men. Her lawsuit, filed in New York on 16 September, says Sarabia grabbed her face, kissed her and joined others in snorting ketamine off her body; his lawyers dispute his alleged role and say some claims may be time-barred. Sarabia has also asked a judge to restrict public comments by Doe’s lawyer. No criminal charges have been filed, and a state investigation is ongoing.

In short

  • Jane Doe is contesting Sarabia’s bid to dismiss claims against him.
  • Seven men are named in the civil lawsuit, and all deny wrongdoing.
  • No criminal charges have been filed; a state investigation continues.

Steelman: both sides, in good faith

The strongest fair case each way — we don't pick a winner.

The case for

Doe’s strongest case is that her account describes Sarabia as participating in the encounter, and that the lawsuit should be allowed to proceed so the evidence can be tested before a judge rather than dismissed at an early stage. She may argue that the complaint gives enough detail about his alleged conduct to support her claims and that public discussion should not prevent her from pursuing them.

The case against

Sarabia’s strongest case is that a serious allegation should not, by itself, establish legal responsibility: the complaint must connect him sufficiently to the alleged assaults and satisfy the elements and deadlines for each claim. He denies the allegations and may argue that the claims against him are inadequately supported or time-barred, while seeking limits on public comments to protect fairness as the case proceeds.

Explained simply

Cornell University is a private university in Ithaca, New York. Chi Phi is a social fraternity, a student organisation with a house where members may live or hold events.

The civil lawsuit was brought by a former student, identified in court as Jane Doe, against seven men. A civil case allows someone to seek a legal remedy; it is separate from a criminal case, in which prosecutors decide whether to bring charges.

The men named in the lawsuit may contest the allegations in court, and no finding of liability has been made. The case is part of a wider state investigation, which is separate from the lawsuit.

Business Markets World

Read the full article at the source →

Log in to join the discussion