HUGH HEWITT: The hidden advantage that could turn Senate toss-ups into GOP wins
The article argues that Senate candidates’ seniority, committee roles and ability to work with the party likely to hold the majority could sway close races. It presents these advantages as reasons voters might favour Republican incumbents or challengers in several battleground states.
It points to Susan Collins’s Appropriations Committee chairmanship in Maine, Jon Husted’s incumbency in Ohio and Dan Sullivan’s experience in Alaska, while predicting wins for Republicans in those states and South Carolina. In Michigan, it contrasts Mike Rogers’s House experience with Abdul El-Sayed’s politics; it also notes Alaska’s ranked-choice ballot and a second candidate named Dan Sullivan. These are the author’s arguments and forecasts, not confirmed results.
In short
- The author says Senate seniority could influence close races.
- The piece predicts Republican wins in several states.
- Alaska’s ballot includes two candidates named Dan Sullivan.
Steelman: both sides, in good faith
The strongest fair case each way — we don't pick a winner.
The case for
Seniority, committee roles and relationships across party lines can help senators secure funding and influence policy, giving voters a practical reason to favour candidates with experience or a likely path to power. In close races, those advantages may matter alongside a candidate’s platform, and incumbents may be better placed to deliver for their states.
The case against
Seniority and access to leadership do not guarantee effective representation, and voters may reasonably prioritise a candidate’s policies, judgement or responsiveness over their place in Congress. A forecast based on party control and incumbency can also understate local concerns and voter preferences, while the article’s predictions remain uncertain rather than established outcomes.
Explained simply
The US Senate is one of the two chambers of Congress, where lawmakers make federal laws and approve spending. Each state elects two senators, and elections can determine which party controls the chamber and its committees.
Seniority and committee roles can give senators influence over which issues receive attention and how federal money is allocated. Candidates may also argue that they can work effectively with whichever party holds the Senate majority, though voters weigh these claims alongside policy and other factors.
The races discussed include Maine, Ohio, Alaska, Michigan and South Carolina. Alaska uses ranked-choice voting, in which voters rank candidates in order; when no candidate wins outright, lower-ranked candidates are eliminated and votes are redistributed.
Elections Government Politics World