Eisenkot gets first opportunity to form Israel’s next government

Steelman: both sides, in good faith

The strongest fair case each way — we don't pick a winner.

The case for

Eisenkot’s backers could argue that the election produced no clear majority and that he has a legitimate chance to assemble one through negotiation. Seeking support from Arab-led parties, including support from outside the coalition, could reflect the parliamentary arithmetic and give voters a government able to command confidence while upholding agreed civic and security principles.

The case against

Critics could argue that a coalition dependent on parties whose positions or priorities conflict with those of its other members may be unstable or unable to govern effectively. They may also say that excluding Arab-led parties from government, or refusing their support on the proposed terms, better protects shared policy commitments and avoids forming a majority whose members disagree on fundamental questions.